ANALYSIS OF THE SUPERIORITY OF TOTAL HYSTERECTOMY OVER SUBTOTAL HYSTERECTOMY
Keywords:
subtotal and total hysterectomy, the life after operationAbstract
The relevance of the topic: In our time, the development of innovative methods of treatment of pathology of the female genital system can not significantly reduce the level of uterine removal operations. Scientific approaches to hysterectomy are diverse in scientific studies in the scientific world There is no single opinion on the scope of surgery: general or subtotal, storage or removal of ovaries. Questions about the surgical approach to hysterectomy (abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic) are still controversial. There are total and subtotal types of uterine removal surgery. Incomplete removal of the uterus, leaving the cervix, is called subtotal hysterectomy, complete, cervical removal is called total hysterectomy in medicine. Despite the rapid introduction of convenient and minimally invasive methods of surgery, the question of complete or incomplete removal of the uterus remains more relevant than the method of surgery. Based on the results of many scientific studies and indications in the literature, unlike subtotal hysterectomy, vaginal wall lowering, or sexual dysfunction, that occurs after total hysterectomy remains unproven. Therefore, it is not an exaggeration to say that subtotal hysterectomy should be performed only in healthy women.
Research methods: analysis of theoretical, scientific and methodological literature on the subject, as well as the determination of the priority of total hysterectomy over subtotal hysterectomy.
Conclusion. Surgery and its many advantages are demonstrated in technically complex operations, such as atypical localization of myomatous nodes, common endometrioid infiltrates. and may reduce the frequency of postoperative complications.
References
Высоцкий М.М., Манухин И.Б., Овакимян М.А. Особенности техники лапароскопической гистерэктомии при больших размерах матки. Эндоскопическая хирургия. 2009;4: 37-40. [Vysotskii MM, Manukhin IB, Ovakimyan MA. Osobennosti tekhniki laparoskopicheskoi gisterektomii pri bol'shikh razmerakh matki. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya. 2009;4:37-40.]
Адамян Л.В., Андреева Е.Н., Артымук Н.В. и др. Миома матки: диагностика, лечение и реабилитация. Клинические рекомендации по ведению больных. М. 2015. [Adamyan LV, Andreeva EN, Artymuk NV. i dr. Mioma matki: diagnostika, lechenie i reabilitatsiya. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii po vedeniyu bol'nykh. M. 2015. (In Russ.)]
Беженарь В.Ф., Цыпурдеева А.А., Долинский А.К., Бочоришвили Р.Г. Лапароскопическая гистерэктомия — семилетний опыт. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2011;60(4):12-20. [Bezhenar' VF, Tsypurdeeva AA, Dolinskii AK, Bochorishvili RG. Laparoskopicheskaya gisterektomiya — semiletnii opyt. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh boleznei. 2011;60(4):12-20. (In Russ.)]
Andersen LL, Ottesen B, Alling-Møller LM et al. Subtotal versus total abdominal hysterectomy: randomized clinical trial with 14-year questionnaire follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014. pii: S0002-9378(14)02498-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.039
Anvar Ibragimovich Kamalov, Larisa Rubenovna Aghababyan, Medical aspects of prevention of massive bleeding after childbirth, Journal of Biomedicine and Practice. 2022, vol. 7,Issue 1, pp.11-16
van Evert JS, Smeenk JM, Dijkhuizen FP et al. Laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy versus laparoscopic total hysterectomy: a decade of experience. Gynecol Surg. 2010;7(1):9-12.
Oscarsson U, Poromaa IS, Nussler E, Lofgren M. No difference in length of hospital stay between laparoscopic and abdominal supravaginal hysterectomy — a preliminary
Robert M, Soraisham A, Sauve R. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008. Postoperative urinary incontinence after total abdominal hysterectomy or supracervical hysterectomy: a metaanalysis
Todd R. Jenkins. Laparoscopicsupracervical hysterectomy. American Journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2004;191:1875-1884.
Кулаков В.И., Адамян Л.В., Аскольская С.И. Гистерэктомия и здоровье женщины. М.: Медицина; 1999. [Kulakov VI, Adamyan LV, Askol'skaya SI. Gisterektomiya i zdorov'e zhenshchiny. M.: Meditsina; 1999. (In Russ.)]
Паукер В.А. Здоровье женщины после тотальной и субтотальной гистерэктомии, произведенной по поводу миомы матки: Дис. ... канд. мед. наук. М. 1997. [Pauker VA. Zdorov'e zhenshchiny posle total'noi i subtotal'noi gisterektomii, proizvedennoi po povodu miomy matki: Dis. ... kand. med. nauk. M. 1997. (In Russ.)]
Scott JR, Sharp HT, Dodson MK, Norton PA, Warner HR. Subtotal hysterectomy in modern gynaecology: a decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;176:1186-1192.
Vale DB et al. Usefulness of vaginal cytology tests in women with previous hysterectomy for benign diseases: assessment of 53.891 tests. Gynecologic oncology. 2015;137(2):270-273.
Hannoun-Levi J, Peiffert D, Hoffstetter S, Luporsi E, Bey P, Pernot M. Carcinoma of the cervical stump: retrospective analysis of 77 cases. Radiother Oncol. 1997;43(2):147-153.
Akintobi A, Bello O, Asaolu OA et al. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and uterine morcellation: case report from Asokoro District Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2015;18:824-827.
Erian J, El-Shawarby SA, Hassan M et al. Laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy using the plasma kinetic and lap loop systems: An alternative approach in the surgical management of women with uterine fibroids. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2008;137(1):84-87.
Gimbel H. Total or subtotal hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases? A meta-analysis. Actaobstetricia et gynecologicascandinavica. 2007;86(2):133-144.
Hasson HM. Cervical removal at hysterectomy for bening disease. J Reprod Med. 1993;38:781-790.
Van Wijngaarden WJ, Duncan ID. Upper age limit for cervical screening. BMJ. 1993;306(6889):1409-1410.
Kikku P, Gronroos M, Rauramo L. Supravaginal uterine amputation with perioperative electrocoagulation of endocervical mucosa. Description of method. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1985;64(2):175-17
Alvarez-Rodas E, Mettler L, Semm K. Histologic features of the CISH procedure. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994;2(1):37-41.
Mettler L. (ed). Endoscopische Abdominalchirurgie in der Gynäkologie. Stuttgart. 2002.
Mettler L. (ed). Manual for laparoscopic and hysteroscopic gynecological surgery. Jaypee Brothers, New Delhi. 2006.
Mettler L, Ahmed-Ebbiary N et al. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: challenges and limitations. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2005;14(3):145-159.
Semm K. Hysterectomy via laparotomy or pelviscopy. A new CASH method without colpotomy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1991;51(12):996-1003.
Semm K. Hysterectomy by pelviscopy; an alternative approach without colpotomy (CASH). In Garry R., Reich H. (eds). Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. 1993;118-132.
Кулаков В.И., Адамян Л.В., Мынбаев О.А. Оперативная гинекология, хирургические энергии. Гистерэктомия и здоровье женщины. М.: Медицина; 2000. [Kulakov VI, Adamyan LV, Mynbaev OA. Operativnaya ginekologiya khirurgicheskie energii. Gisterektomiya i zdorov'e zhenshchiny. M.: Meditsina; 2000. (In Russ.)]
Zebiniso Azizovna Nasirova, possibilities of using the lark system after abdominal delivery, Journal of Biomedicine and Practice. 2022, vol. 7, Issue 1, pp.22-28
Pouwels NS et al. Cervix removal at the time of hysterectomy: factors affecting patients’ choice and effect on subsequent sexual function. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2015;195:67-71.
Rahn DD et al. Does supracervical hysterectomy provide more support to the vaginal apex than total abdominal hysterectomy? American Journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2007;197(6):650-650.
