ASSESSMENT OF PERINATAL COMPLICATIONS RISK USING REMOTE CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY MONITORING
Keywords:
cardiotocography, perinatal outcomes, childbirth, complications, prevention, remote monitoringAbstract
Cardiotocography (CTG) is the main method used to assess the condition of the fetus. It provides information about the fetal heart rate and activity. CTG is widely used in clinical practice to monitor the fetus's condition during both pregnancy and labor. Depending on the risk factors, different types of CTG are employed. Knowledge of the basic principles and terminology of CTG, as well as experience in interpreting the results, helps improve childbirth outcomes and determine the right management strategy. The record made during labor serves as a medical document and can be used for comprehensive assessment of the delivery process or as legal protection for medical staff in complex situations.
References
Arabin B. et al. Prediction of fetal distress and adverse outcomes in post-term pregnancy using Doppler and fetal heart rate monitoring in combination with stress tests (II) // Fetal. Diagn. Ther. – 1994. – Vol. 9, №1. – P. 1-6.
Georgieva A., Payne S.D., Molden M., Redman C.W.G. Artificial neural networks applied for fetal monitoring during labor // Neural Computing and Applications. – 2013. – Vol. 22, №1. – P. 85-93.
Aires de Campos D., Bernardes J. Twenty-five years after the International Federation for Fetal Monitoring (FIGO) guidelines on the use of fetal monitoring: time for a simplified approach? // Int. J. Obst. Gynecol. – 2010. – Vol. 110, №1. – P. 1-6.
Brambhatt D., Ross H., Moayedi Y. Application of Digital Technologies to Improve Health Care Response: Lessons Learned from COVID-19 // Canad. J. Cardiol. – 2022. – Vol. 38, №2. – P. 279-291.
Brown A. et al. AI in Remote CTG Data Analysis // AI in Healthcare, 2019.
Das M. et al. Clinical validation of a mobile cardiotocograph for intrapartum and antenatal monitoring compared with a standard cardiotocograph: an inter-rater agreement study // J. Fam. Reprod. Health. – 2019. – Vol. 13, №2. – P. 109-115.
Gan Y., Zhu C., Zhou Y. et al. Clinical efficacy and acceptability of remote fetal heart rate self-monitoring in Southern China // BMC Pregn. Childbirth. – 2023. – Vol. 23, №1. – P. 715.
Goldenberg R. et al. COVID-19 antibody positivity over time and pregnancy outcomes in seven low- and middle-income countries: a prospective observational study from the global // Women's and Child. Health Res. Network. – 2023. – Vol. 130, №4. – P. 366-376.
Johnson, L. et al. "Psychological Impact of Remote CTG," British Journal of Obstetrics, 2019.
Muller H. et al. Effectiveness of Remote CTG Monitoring // German J. Obstet. – 2020.
Pinas A., Chandraharan E. Continuous cardiotocography during labor: analysis, classification and management // Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. – 2016. – Vol. 30. – P. 33-47.
Porter P. et al. Accuracy, Clinical Utility, and Usability of a Wireless Self-Guided Fetal Heart Rate Monitor // Obstet. Gynecol. – 2021. – Vol. 137, №4. – P. 673-681.
Reis de Carvalho S., Nogueira P., Aires de Campos D. Quality of fetal heart rate monitoring using transabdominal fetal ECG during maternal movement during labor: a prospective study // Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. – 2022. – Vol. 101, №11. – P. 1269-1275.
Schwartz N. et al. Innovative Monitoring of Uterine Contractions Enabling Remote Self-Administered Nonstress Testing // Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. – 2022. – Vol. 226, №4. – P. e1-554.e12.
Smith S. et al. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. Randomized clinical comparison with a non-stress test // Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. – 1986. – Vol. 155, №1. – P. 131-134.
Smith J. et al. Remote Monitoring in High-Risk Pregnancies // J. Obstet. – 2018.
Uze de l'Olmois A. et al. Development of an Intelligent Mobile Data Module for Fetal Monitoring in Health // J. Med. Syst. – 2018. – Vol. 42, №5. – P. 83.
Рахимов Н. М. и др. ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТЬ ЛЕЧЕНИЯ АСЦИТА ОБУСЛОВЛЕННЫЙ РЕЦИДИВОМ ПЛАТИНОРЕФРАКТЕРНОГО РАКА ЯИЧНИКА С ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕМ МЕТРОНОМНОЙ ХИМИОТЕРАПИИ //ЖУРНАЛ РЕПРОДУКТИВНОГО ЗДОРОВЬЯ И УРО-НЕФРОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ. – 2024. – Т. 5. – №. 1.
Abdurakhmonov Jurabek , Rahimov Nodir , Shakhanova Shakhnoza . Modern view on ascite in ovarian cancer. Journal of Biomedicine and Practice . 2022, vol . 7, issue 4, pp . 130-139
Alimjanovich JR, Agababyan LR, Kamalov AI Prevention and Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage //CENTRAL ASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND NATURAL SCIENCES. – 2021. – T. 2. – No. 4. – S. 204-209.
Rizaev Jasur , Rakhimov Nodir , Kodyrov Khamidullo , Shakhanova Shakhnoza . Study of prostate cancer death by regions of the republic of Uzbekistan.Journal of Biomedicine and Practice. 2022, vol . 7, issue 5, pp.202-210
Porter P. et al. Psychological Benefits of Remote Fetal Monitoring // British Journal of Obstetrics, 2019.
