OPTIMIZATION OF THE TREATMENT OF SECONDARY ADENTIA IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBID PATHOLOGY

Authors

  • Burgutova Umidaxon Muhammadjonovna
  • Iskhakova Zukhra Sharifkulovna

Keywords:

secondary adentia, comorbid pathology, dental rehabilitation, dental implantation, removable prosthetics, treatment optimization, quality of life, chewing efficiency, alveolar ridge atrophy

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery represents a modern trend in medicine aimed at reducing procedural trauma, shortening the duration of interventions, and minimizing postoperative recovery time. In dentistry, this concept has become widely implemented in oral surgery, implantology, and periodontology. Minimally invasive approaches in dental implantology involve performing procedures with maximal preservation of soft and hard tissue integrity, avoiding extensive flap elevation, and reducing the number of auxiliary manipulations. Consequently, these techniques decrease postoperative pain, lower the risk of complications, and significantly improve the psychoemotional status of patients. Contemporary studies demonstrate that, given sufficient bone volume and favorable anatomical conditions, minimally invasive techniques are not inferior to conventional approaches in terms of clinical effectiveness and may substantially enhance patient satisfaction.

References

Cristea I., et al. Oral and periodontal risk factors of prosthetic success for fixed dental prostheses. Diagnostics. 2023;13(5):852.

Bakopoulos A. Clinical and radiographic changes at implants supporting fixed partial dental prostheses after long-term loading. Journal of Clinical Dentistry. 2025.

Ma Z.G., Li Y., Wang X., et al. Three-dimensional imaging of dental alveolar bone changes in periodontal patients. International Journal of Oral Science. 2015;7(2):78-84.

Onea N. Management of patients with periodontal disease requiring prosthodontic treatment by dental bridges. Journal of Dental Prosthodontics. 2024.

Lee C.T., Kabir T., Nelson J., et al. Deep learning approach for measuring radiographic alveolar bone levels in periodontal diagnosis. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 2021.

Rosenstiel S.F., Land M.F., Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 5th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2016.

Shillingburg H.T., Hobo S., Whitsett L.D., Jacobi R., Brackett S. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2012.

Калинин М.И., Вагнер В.Д. Клинические и рентгенологические изменения тканей пародонта при использовании мостовидных протезов. Москва: Медицина; 2004.

Тропин В.А. Биомеханический анализ мостовидного протеза для замещения дефектов зубного ряда. Клиническая стоматология. 2015;3:45-49.

Carranza F.A., Newman M.G., Takei H.H., Klokkevold P.R. Carranza's Clinical Periodontology. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019.

Published

2026-06-22