KESAR RTSISHDAN KEYIN BACHADONDAGI CHANDIQINI BITISH UCHUN PRP TERAPİYASINI FOYDALANISH TAJRIBASI
##article.subject##:
sezaryen so'ng bachadon chandig'i, trombotsitlar autoplazma, ultratovush, qon tomir doppler##article.abstract##
Maqsad. Operatsiya paytida qo'llaniladigan trombotsitlar autoplazmasining reparativ regeneratsiya jarayonlariga va sezaryen so'ng bachadonda to'liq chandiq shakllanishiga ta'sirini baholash. Materiallar va usullar. Sezaryen (KS) operatsiyasini o'tkazgan 116 nafar ayol tekshirildi asosiy guruh 45 ayoldan iborat bo'lib, ular bachadondagi kesma tikilganidan keyin jarrohlik paytida trombotsitlar avtoplazmasi (TAP) qo'llanildi; taqqoslash guruhi 71 operatsiya qilingan bemorlardan iborat bo'lib TAP ishlatilmagan. Chokning holatini aniqlash uchun klinik va laboratoriya parametrlari, ultratovush ko'rsatkichlari va bachadon tomirlarida qon oqimining Doppler o'lchovlari baholandi. Natijalar. Asosiy guruhda echografik belgilar ushbu turdagi tikuv yaxshiroq gemostatik ta'sirga ega degan xulosaga kelishimizga imkon berdi. TAP dan foydalanish CS dan keyin bachadon involyutsiyasini yaxshilaydi (p<0,05). Operatsiyadan 3 oy o'tgach, asosiy guruhdagi ultratovush tekshiruvi bemorlarning atigi 2,2 foizida chandiqning biroz yupqalashishini aniqladi, nazorat guruhida esa 11,3 foizda qobiliyatsiz chandiq aniqlandi. Xulosa. Trombotsitlar avtoplazmasini bachadondagi tikuvlar maydoniga operatsiya vaqtida yuborish sezaryen so'ng bachadon chandig'ining davolanishiga ijobiy ta'sir ko'rsatdi, reparativ regeneratsiya jarayonini tezlashtirishga, to'liq chandiq hosil bo'lishiga imkon berdi. angiogenezning kuchayishi va qon tomirlarining yaxshilanishi sababida.
Библиографические ссылки
Краснопольский В.И., Буянова С.Н., Щукина НА, Логутова Л.С. Несостоятельность шва (рубца) на матке после КС: проблемы и решения. //Росс. вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2015; 3:4-8. https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush20151534-8
Макиян З.Н., Адамян Л.В., Карабач В.В., Чупрынин В.Д. Новый метод хирургического лечения несостоятельности рубца на матке после кесарева сечения с помощью внутриматочного манипулятора с желобом. //Акушерство и гинекология. 2020; 2: 104-10. https://dxdoi.org/1018565/aig.20202104-110.
Ciebiera M, Ciebiera M, Czekanska-Rawska M, Jakiel G. Laparoscopic isthmocele treatment - single center experience. // Videosurgery Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017; 12:88-95. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2017.66025
Robson SJ, de Costa CM. Thirty years of the World Health Organization's target caesarean section rate: time to move on. // Med. J. Aust. 2017; 206:181-5. DOI: 10.5694/mja16.00832
Satpathy G, Kumar I, Matah M, Verma A. Comparative accuracy of magnetic resonance morphometry and sonography in assessment of post-cesarean uterine scar. //Indian J. Radiol Imaging. 2018; 28:169-74. E mail: drdnv5@gmail.com
Seliger G, Chaoui K, Lautenschlager C et al. Technique of sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment in women with previous cesarean delivery: a prospective, pre/intraoperative comparative ultrasound study. // Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2018; 298: 297-306. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-4805-6
Setubal A, Alves J, Osorio F et al. Treatment for uterine isthmocele, a pouch-like defect at the site of cesarean section scar. // J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2017. https://doi.org/doi.-10.1016lj.jmig2017.09022.
Tang X., Wang J., Du Yet al. Caesarean scar defect: Risk factors and comparison of evaluation efficacy between transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. //Eur. J. Obstet Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2019; 242:1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.09.001
Tanimura S, Funamoto H, Hosono T et al. New diagnostic criteria and operative strategy for cesarean scar syndrome: endoscopic repair for secondary infertility caused by cesarean scar defect. //J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res 2015; 41:1363-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12738
Tavukcu HH, Aytaç Ö, Atuğ F, Alev B, Çevik Ö, Bülbül N, Yarat A, Çetinel Ş, Şener G, Kulaksızoğlu H. Protective effect of platelet-rich plasma on urethral injury model of male rats. // Neurourol. Urodyn. 2018;37(4):1286‒1293. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23460.
Tulandi T, Cohen A. Emerging manifestations of Cesarean scar defect in reproductive-aged women. // J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23:893-902. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.06.020
Van der Voet LF, Jordans IP, Brolmann HA et al. Changes in the uterine scar during the first year after a caesarean section: a prospective longitudinal study. //Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2017. https://doi.10.1159/000478046
Zhang Y. A comparative study of transvaginal repair and laparoscopic repair in the management of patients with previous Cesarean scar defect. // J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23:535-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.007
