ONTOLOGICAL MODELING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TERMS IN UZBEK
Keywords:
information technology terminology, foreign terms, lexicographic adaptation, terminological systematization, ontological modeling, hyponymic relations, meronymic relations, semantic features of terms, structural features of terms, transliteration, loan translation (calquing), term variability, conceptual system, ontological dictionaryAbstract
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of ontological modeling information technology (IT) terms in the Uzbek language. The study aims to evaluate the formation of IT terminology in Uzbek based on lexicographic principles and to determine its position within a conceptual system through an ontological approach. In order to achieve this objective, the research identifies the mechanisms of term assimilation, examines their representation in lexicographic sources, evaluates semantic and structural adaptation, and analyzes ontological relations like hyponymy and meronymy. The methodology combines lexico-semantic analysis, comparative analysis, conceptual analysis, and ontological modeling. The corpus includes selected IT terms (e.g., server, database, interface, protocol, firewall, cloud computing) from software, networking, and data management domains. The findings indicate that borrowing is primarily realized through transliteration and partial calquing; however, consistency and standardization remain insufficient. Lexical definitions often fail to capture conceptual depth, leading to variability and ambiguity within the terminological system. Ontological analysis demonstrates that hierarchical and partitive relations enable the integration of terms into a structured knowledge system. The study concludes that effective adaptation requires the integration of lexicographic and ontological approaches. This contributes to terminology standardization, improved scientific communication, and the development of structured terminological resources.
References
Abduraxmonova N. (2012). Mashina tarjimasining lingvistik asoslari. – Toshkent: Akademnashr, pp. 154-155 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341554443_Mashina_tarjimasining_lingvistik_ta' minoti
Abduraxmonova N. (2020). Kompyuter lingvistikasi. Toshkent: Nodirabegim. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344243113_Kompyuter_lingvistikasi_darslik
Abduraxmonova N. (2020). Mashina tarjimasining lingvistik ta’minoti. Toshkent: Nodirabegim, pp. 186-187. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341554443_Mashina_tarjimasining_lingvistik_ta' minoti
L’Homme, M.-C. (2020). Lexical semantics for terminology: An introduction. John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 45–74.
https://benjamins.com/catalog/tlrp.20
Cabré, M. T. (1999). Terminology: Theory, methods and applications. John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 87–128.
https://benjamins.com/catalog/tlrp.1
Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. Prentice Hall, pp. 98–110. https://archive.org/details/textbookoftransl0000newm
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press, pp. 112–118, 245–252. https://books.google.com/books?id=6DJiQgAACAAJ
Cruse, D. A. (2004). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, pp. 136–140. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/meaning-in-language-9780199263067
Guarino, N. (1998). Formal ontology in information systems. In N. Guarino (Ed.), Formal ontology in information systems (pp. 5–12). IOS Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220100704
Cimiano, P. (2006). Ontology learning and population from text: Algorithms, evaluation and applications. Springer, pp. 23–49.
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-0-387-39252-3
Faber, P. (2022). A cognitive linguistics view of terminology and specialized language. De Gruyter, pp. 65–92.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110622332
Faber, P., León-Araúz, P., & Reimerink, A. (2020). Linking terminology and knowledge engineering: A new perspective on specialized knowledge representation. Terminology,
(1), 1–23.
https://doi.org/10.1075/term.00037.fab
Kockaert, H. J., & Steurs, F. (Eds.). (2021). Handbook of terminology (Vol. 2). John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 55–78.
https://benjamins.com/catalog/hot.2
Grabar, N., Hamon, T., & Zweigenbaum, P. (2024). Terminology and knowledge representation in digital environments. In Proceedings of LREC-COLING 2024 (pp. 364–372).
https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.364
Zeng, M. L. (2021). Knowledge organization systems (KOS) and ontology: A new perspective. Knowledge Organization, 48(1), 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2021-1-1
Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., & Magnini, B. (2020). Ontology learning from text: Methods, evaluation and applications. Springer, pp. 15–42. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-46720-9
Temmerman, R. (2000). Towards new ways of terminology description: The sociocognitive approach. John Benjamins, pp. 25–60.
https://benjamins.com/catalog/tlrp.3
Bowker, L. (2015). Terminology and specialized language. Routledge, pp. 45–70. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717426
Sager, J. C. (1990). A practical course in terminology processing. John Benjamins, pp. 89–120.
https://benjamins.com/catalog/z.44
Wüster, E. (1979). Introduction to the general theory of terminology. Springer, pp. 35–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-8583-6
Gaudin, F. (2003). Socioterminology: A sociolinguistic approach to terminology. John Benjamins, pp. 70–95.
https://benjamins.com/catalog/tlrp.13
Pearson, J. (1998). Terms in context. John Benjamins, pp. 50–85. https://benjamins.com/catalog/z.86
ISO 704. (2009). Terminology work — Principles and methods. International Organization for Standardization, pp. 1–45.