THE DIFFERENCES AND CALAMITIES OF INSTRUCTING LEGAL ENGLISH IN EFL CLASSES THROUGH CONTENT – BASED INSTRUCTION

Authors

  • Shakhribonu Sirojiddinova

Keywords:

content-based learning, English for specific purposes, jurisdiction, teaching, legal terminology, legal English

Abstract

This article examines the special features of conducting English for specific purposes (ESP) classes in terms of instructing juristic terms in English together with discussing the possible calamities that students may face during the process of learning legal English, as well as overcoming those hardships with the assistance and implementation of content-based teaching, what has been regarded as of plethora of helpfulness and therefore being widely used in English as a foreign language (EFL) classes. The author also further investigates and provides relevant data concerning useful methods and strategies of teaching and learning legal terminology in English as a foreign language.

References

Azizova S. M. Features of professionally oriented education English for students of legal profile // Pedagogical journal. - 2016. - No. 4. - P. 251-260.

Alontseva N. V. Teaching law students in educational and professional communication in English // Bulletin of RUDN. - Series: Educational issues: languages and specialties. - 2007. - No. 1. - P. 64-67.

Brinton, M., Wesche M., and Snow, M. (1989). Content-based second language instruction. New York: Newbury House.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Longman.

Cummins, J. (1984). Wanted: A theoretical framework for relating language proficiency to academic achievement among bilingual students. Rivera, C. (ed.), Language proficiency and academic achievement. Clevedon, England. Multilingual Matters 10, 2-19.

Eremeeva GR, Baranova AR, Mefodieva MA Professionally oriented teaching of English to students of non-linguistic specialties // Kazan pedagogical journal. - T. 2. - 2016. - No. 2. - P. 339- 342.

Glenn, O. M. (2005). The development of English literacy and global studies concepts using sheltered instruction. Dissertation Abstracts International, (UMI No. 3166569).

Grabe, W., and Stoller F. L. (1997). A six-T's approach to content-based instruction. Donna M. Brinton and Margaret A. Snow (eds.) Content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content. New York: Longman, 78- 94.

Hutchinson, T. and Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A learning centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kasper, L. F. (1994a). Improved reading performance for ESL students through academic course pairing. Journal of Reading, 37, 376-384.

Kasper, L. F. (1995/96). Using discipline-based texts to boost college ESL reading instruction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39(4), 298-306.

Kasper, L. F. (1995a). Discipline-oriented ESL reading instruction. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 22, 45-53.

Kasper, L. F. (1995b). Theory and practice in content-based ESL reading instruction. English for Specific Purposes, 14, 223-230.

Kasper, L. F. (1997). Assessing long-term effects of content-based ESL instruction. A paper presented at Discipline-Based ESL Instruction: Benefits and Implementation (a CUNY Development Colloquium). [Online] Available: http://members.aol.com/hta/Drlfk/long.term.effects.html(Accessed August 10, 2008).

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.

Kuznetsova S. V., Gramma D. V. Some issues of training professionally oriented English // Innovative Science. - 2015. - No. 12. - P. 229-230.

Lo, Y. G. (2012). ESP versus EGP: A case study of an ESP program for vocational high school students of Tourism. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 3(2), 71-100.

Mason, C. (1971). The Relevance of intensive training in English as a foreign language for university students. Language Learning 21(2), 197-204.

Morioka, A.; Hayashi, A. T.; and Ushida E. (2008). Developing web-based multilevel materials for Japanese content based instruction. Japanese Language and Literature, 42(2), Japanese Language Education (Oct., 2008), 361-387. American Association of Teachers of Japanese.

Parkinson, J. (2000). Acquiring scientific literacy through content and genre: A theme-based language course for science students. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 369-387.

Richards, J. C., and Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Snow, M. A.; Met, M., and Genesee, F. (1989). A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 201-219

Stryker, S. B., and Lou Betty L. (1997). Content-based instruction in foreign language education: models and methods. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

Swain, M. (1974). French immersion programs across Canada: Research findings. The Canadian Modern Language Review 31(2), 117-129.

Ter-Minasova S. G. Language and intercultural communication. - M.: Publishing house Mos. University, 2008 .-- 352 p.

Tsai, Y., and Shang, H.(2010). The Impact of content-based language instruction on EFL students' reading performance. Asian Social Science, 6(3), March 2010. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 77-85

Downloads

Published

2022-02-02