SYNTACTIC LINKS CREATED BY PROFESSOR A.M. MUKHIN
Keywords:
methodology, linguistics, paradigm, types of syntactic binding, syntactic relations, syntactic conjunction, complex object, unites a higher element, unites a lower element, methods, syntactic linksAbstract
This article focuses on syntactic relations and their features in language. Research methodology problems are not often addressed in linguistics. Logically, consciously choosing a method within the requirements of this science helps to find a solution to the research faster. The first of the methods is based on theory, the second is based on practice, and it is not a symbol of any theory, but a product of the reality of life and the universal laws of intellectual and psychological development of a scientist.
References
Leszczak O., 2008, Lingwosemiotyczna teoria doświadczenia, т. 1. Funkcjonalno- -pragmatyczna metodologia badań lingwosemiotycznych, Kielce.
Leszczak O., 2009, Lingwosemiotyczna teoria doświadczenia, т. 2. Doświadczenie potoczne a językowy obraz świata, Kielce.
Leszczak O., 2010, Lingwosemiotyka kultury. Funkcjonalno-pragmatyczna teoria dyskursu, Toruń.
Мухин А.М., 2004, Эксперимент и моделирование в лингвистике: Структурный синтаксис предложения, Санкт-Петербург.
Семкина Г.Г., 2009, К вопросу об аппозитивной синтаксической связи [в:] Лингвистическое наследие Шарля Балли в XXI веке: М-лы междунар. науч.-практ. конф., Санкт-Петербург, с. 94–97. 6. Смирницкий А.И., 1957, Синтаксис английского языка, Москва
N.N.Zubaydova, Стилистический потенциал и коннотативнқе признаки фразеосем английского языка Хоrijiy filologiya №1, 2019 yil
Sh.O.Mamayoqubova, Pedagogical conditions of professional development of higher educational establishment teacher. So’z san’ati №5, 2022 yil
A. M. Muxin, Linguističeskij analiz. Teoretičeskie i metodologičeskie problemy. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo ‘Nauka’, Leningradskoe Otdelenie, 1976. Pp. 281.
N.F.Ochilova, O’zbek tilida maqsad ergash gapnig tasnifi, So’z san’ati №4, 2021
