O‘ZBEK MILLIY IDENTIKLIGINI TADQIQ ETISHNING ZAMONAVIY TARIXSHUNOSLIK TENDENSIYALARI
##article.subject##:
o‘zbek milliy identikligi, tarixshunoslik, identifikatsiya, metodologiya, xorijiy tarixshunoslik, antropologik yondashuv##article.abstract##
Mazkur maqolada o‘zbek milliy identikligini tadqiq etishning zamonaviy tarixshunoslik tendensiyalari tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotda zamonaviy xorijiy tarixshunoslikda o‘zbek identikligini o‘rganishga oid nazariy va metodologik yondashuvlarning o‘zgarishi ko‘rib chiqiladi. Tadqiqotning metodologik asosini tarixshunoslik, qiyosiy-tarixiy, tizimli va tarixiy-genetik metodlar hamda kontent-tahlil tashkil etadi. Tahlil natijasida identiklikni etnik kelib chiqish va davlat siyosati doirasida izohlashdan ijtimoiy-madaniy jarayon, identifikatsiya va kundalik amaliyotlar orqali o‘rganishga siljish aniqlanadi. Shuningdek, arxiv materiallari bilan antropologik dala tadqiqotlarini uyg‘unlashtirish tendensiyasi ko‘rsatiladi. Maqolada zamonaviy yondashuvlarning imkoniyatlari va mavjud metodologik muammolari umumlashtiriladi. Tadqiqot natijalari o‘zbek milliy identikligini o‘rganishning istiqbolli yo‘nalishlarini belgilashga xizmat qiladi.
Библиографические ссылки
Allworth E. The Modern Uzbeks: From the Fourteenth Century to the Present: A Cultural History. – Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1990. – 423 p.
Critchlow J. Nationalism in Uzbekistan: A Soviet Republic's Road to Sovereignty. – Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991.
Fierman W. Language Planning and National Development: The Uzbek Experience. – Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1991. – 358 p.
Schoeberlein-Engel J. Identity in Central Asia: Construction and Contention in the Conceptions of “Özbek”, “Tâjik”, “Muslim”, “Samarqandi” and Other Groups. PhD diss. – Harvard University, 1994.
Slezkine Y. “The USSR as a Communal Apartment, or How a Socialist State Promoted Ethnic Particularism.” // Slavic Review. – 1994. – Vol. 53. – № 2. – Pp. 414–452.
Akiner Sh. “Islam, the State and Ethnicity in Central Asia in Historical Perspective.” // Religion, State & Society. – 1996. – Vol. 24. – № 2/3. – Pp. 91–132.
Akbarzadeh Sh. “A Note on Shifting Identities in the Ferghana Valley.” // Central Asian Survey. – 1997. – Vol. 16. – № 1. – Pp. 65–68.
Kurzman Ch. “Uzbekistan: The Invention of Nationalism in an Invented Nation.” // Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies. – 1999. – Vol. 8. – № 15. – P. 78.
Smith G., Law V., Wilson A., Bohr A., Allworth E. Nation-building in the Post-Soviet Borderlands: The Politics of National Identities. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Baldauf I. “Some Thoughts on the Making of the Uzbek Nation.” // Cahiers du monde russe et soviétique. – 1991. – Vol. 32. – № 1. – Pp. 79–95.
Fragner B. “‘Soviet Nationalism’: An Ideological Legacy to the Independent Republics of Central Asia.” // Identity Politics in Central Asia and the Muslim World. – London: I.B. Tauris, 2001. – Pp. 13–33.
Martin T. The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939. – Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001.
Hirsch F. Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union. – Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005. – 392 p.
Khalid A. Making Uzbekistan: Nation, Empire, and Revolution in the Early USSR. – Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press, 2015. – 444 p.
Adams L.L. The Spectacular State: Culture and National Identity in Uzbekistan. – Durham; London: Duke University Press, 2010. – 242 p.
Zanca R. Life in a Muslim Uzbek Village: Cotton Farming after Communism. – Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2011. – 212 p.
Rasanayagam J. Islam in Post-Soviet Uzbekistan: The Morality of Experience. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. – 213 p.
Finke P. Variations on Uzbek Identity: Strategic Choices, Cognitive Schemas and Political Constraints in Identification Processes. – New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2014. – XV, 271 p.
Ilkhamov A. “Archeology of Uzbek Identity.” // Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia. – 2006. – Vol. 44. – № 4. – Pp. 10–36.
Pétric B.-M. “Uzbekistan Is Not a Society Based on the Ethnic Principle, but It Can Become That.” // Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia. – 2006. – Vol. 44. – № 4. – Pp. 64–69.
