ЎЗБЕКИСТОН РЕСПУБЛИКАСИ ОЛИЙ ТАЪЛИМ ТИЗИМИГА ХОРИЖИЙ ДУАЛ ТАЪЛИМ ТАЖРИБАСИНИ МОСЛАШТИРИШНИНГ ТАШКИЛИЙ-БОШҚАРУВ МЕХАНИЗМЛАРИ
##article.subject##:
dual taʼlim, institutsional moslashuv, oliy taʼlimni boshqarish, universitet va biznes hamkorligi, Oʻzbekiston mehnat bozori, Germaniya dual taʼlim modeli, raqamli koordinatsiya##article.abstract##
Maqola Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi oliy taʼlim tizimiga dual taʼlim modelini joriy etishda yuzaga keladigan institutsional va tashkiliy gʻovlarni tahlil qilishga bagʻishlangan. Xorijiy (xususan, Germaniya) tajribasini mahalliy mehnat bozori xususiyatlari va oliy taʼlim muassasalarining biznes bilan hamkorlik darajasini hisobga olmasdan koʻchirish xatarlariga alohida eʼtibor qaratilgan. Xalqaro hisobotlar (OECD, UNESCO, ETF) va milliy normativ-huquqiy bazani qiyosiy oʻrganish asosida ish beruvchi taʼlim jarayonining teng huquqli subyekti sifatida ishtirok etadigan koʻp tomonlama sheriklik modeliga oʻtish zarurligi asoslab berilgan. Muallif tomonidan dual formatga oʻtkaziladigan taʼlim dasturlarini saralash mezonlari va oʻquv jarayoni ishtirokchilarini raqamli koordinatsiya qilish sxemasi taklif etilgan.
Библиографические ссылки
Закон Республики Узбекистан «Об образовании» № ЗРУ-637 от 23 сентября 2020 г. Ташкент, 2020.
Постановление Кабинета Министров Республики Узбекистан «О мерах по организации дуального образования в учреждениях высшего образования» № 14 от 16 января 2025 г. Ташкент, 2025.
Billett, S. (2011). Learning Through Practice in the Workplace: Experiences, Perspectives and Innovations. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0545-6
Cedefop (2020). Vocational education and training in Europe, 1995-2015: Scenarios for European VET in the 21st century. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Cedefop reference series, No. 114.
Deissinger, T. (2015). The German dual system: how does it work and what can be learnt from it? International Journal of Training Research, 13(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2015.1029209
Euler, D. (2013). Germany's Dual Vocational Training System: A Model for Other Countries? Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
European Training Foundation (ETF) (2021). Work-based learning and dual VET in Uzbekistan: Torino Process assessment. Turin: ETF.
Hanushek, E. A., Woessmann, L., & Zhang, L. (2017). General education, vocational education, and labor-market outcomes over the life cycle. Journal of Human Resources, 52(1), 48–87. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.52.1.0415-7074R2
Jackson, D. (2015). Employability skill development in work-integrated learning: Barriers and best practice. Studies in Higher Education, 40(2), 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842221
OECD (2023). Education at a Glance 2023: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e1380120-en
Pogatsnik, M. (2018). Dual education: The win-win model of collaboration between universities and industry. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 8(3), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v8i3.8111
Rauner, F., & Smith, E. (Eds.) (2010). Rediscovering Apprenticeship: Research Findings of the International Network on Innovative Apprenticeship (INAP). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3116-7
Sjöö, K., & Hellström, T. (2019). University-industry collaboration: A literature review and synthesis. Industry and Higher Education, 33(4), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422219829697
UNESCO-UNEVOC (2022). Strengthening TVET and dual learning pathways in Central Asia. Bonn: UNESCO-UNEVOC.
