ISSUES OF QUALIFYING THE CRIME OF ENDANGERING AND DISTINGUISHING IT FROM SIMILAR CRIMES
Keywords:
crime, risk, qualification, act, victim, omission, life, health, negligence, intent, subject, liability.Abstract
This article describes the issues of qualifying the crime of endangerment and distinguishing it from similar crimes. In particular, the difference between the crime of Endangerment and a number of other crimes, that is, articles 97, 99, 102, 266 of the Criminal Code and other crimes, has been scientifically substantiated. Also, on the basis of decision No. 10 of June 26, 2015 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On some issues of judicial practice in connection with cases related to crimes against the safety of transport and its use", the cases of qualification of Article 266 of the Criminal Code and Article 117 of the Criminal Code are analyzed. In addition, the circumstances in which a person may be held liable under the relevant part of Article 117 of the Criminal Code for non-fulfillment of the obligations set by the "Traffic Rules" have been clarified. The article presents reasonable proposals and conclusions on the issues of qualifying the crime of endangerment and distinguishing it from similar crimes.
References
Кабулов Р., Якубов А.С., Илхамов А.Н. Жиноятларни квалификация қилиш. Услубий материал. – Тошкент: ЎзР ИИВ Академияси, 2001. – 24 б.; Кабулов Р. Понятие и значение состава преступления по уголовному праву Республики Узбекистан // Ҳуқуқ-Право-Law. – Тошкент, 2002. – № 5. – С. 25-26.; Иркаходжаев А.К., Холикулов У.Ш. Жиноятларни квалификация қилишнинг илмий асослари. Ўқув қўлланма. – Тошкент: ТДЮИ, 2007. – 59 б. (Kabulov R., Yakubov A.S., Ilkhamov A.N. Qualification of crimes. Methodical material. - Tashkent: MIA Academy of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2001. - 24 p; Kabulov R. The concept and significance of the corpus delicti under the criminal law of the Republic of Uzbekistan // Ҳуқуқ-Лау-Law. – Tashkent, 2002. – No. 5. – P. 25-26.; Irkakhodjaev A.K., Kholikulov U.Sh. Scientific basis of qualification of crimes. Study guide. - Tashkent: TDYI, 2007. - 59 p.).
Мыц Я.А. Понятие оставления в опасности // Федерация. – 2005. – №9(11). – С.41-42. (Myts Ya.A. The concept of being left in danger // Federation. – 2005. – No. 9(11). – P.41-42.).
Чугунов А.А., Юрченкова Е.С. К вопросу об уголовной ответственности за оставление в опасности // Вестник экономической безопасности. – 2019. – №3. – С. 210-211. (Chugunov A.A., Yurchenkova E.S. On the issue of criminal liability for leaving in danger // Bulletin of Economic Security. – 2019. – No. 3. – pp. 210-211.).
Давтян Д.В. Некоторые особенности конструирования признаков состава оставления в опасности // European research. – 2015. – № 10 (11). – С. 100–102. (Davtyan D.V. Some features of constructing signs of the composition of leaving in danger // European research. – 2015. – No. 10 (11). – P. 100–102.).
Власов Ю.А. Уголовная ответственность за оставление в опасности: Автореф. дисс. ... канд. юрид. наук. – Омск, 2004. – С.5-6. (Vlasov Yu.A. Criminal liability for leaving in danger: Author's abstract. diss. ...cand. legal Sci. – Omsk, 2004. – P.5-6.).
Бояркина Н.А. Разграничение ст. 125 УК РФ со смежными составами» // Сибирский юридический вестник. – 2012. – №2. – С. 93-94.; Стрижова А.В. Оставление в опасности и его разграничение с убийством, совершенном путём бездействия. теория и правоприменительные аспекты // Вестник магистратуры. – 2016. – №6(57). – С. 115. (Boyarkina N.A. Delimitation of Art. 125 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with related elements” // Siberian Legal Bulletin. – 2012. – No. 2. – P. 93-94.; Strizhova A.V. Leaving in danger and its distinction from murder committed by omission. theory and law enforcement aspects // Magistracy Bulletin. – 2016. – No. 6(57). – P. 115.).
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Олий суди Пленумининг “Транспорт ҳаракати ва ундан фойдаланиш хавфсизлигига қарши жиноятлар билан боғлиқ ишлар юзасидан суд амалиётининг айрим масалалари тўғрисида” 2015 йил 26 июндаги 10-сон қарори // https://lex.uz/docs/2710284 (Decision No. 10 of June 26, 2015 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On some issues of judicial practice in cases related to crimes against the safety of transport and its use" // https://lex.uz/docs/2710284).
Усенков И.А. О некоторых дискуссионных моментах состава «оставление в опасности» // Законность и правопорядок в современном обществе. – 2015. – № 27. – С. 156-157. (Usenkov I.A. About some debatable points of the “leaving in danger” composition // Legality and law and order in modern society. – 2015. – No. 27. – P. 156-157.).
Бояркина Н.А., Денисова А.Е. «Квалификация действия лиц, совершивших оставление в опасности при дорожно-транспортном происшествии» // Вестник Восточно-сибирского института Министерства внутренних дел России. – 2012. – № 3. – С. 30. (Boyarkina N.A., Denisova A.E. “Qualification of the actions of persons who committed leaving in danger during a traffic accident” // Bulletin of the East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. – 2012. – No. 3. – P.). ).30.).
Khamidov, N. "Conditions enabling the commission of some transnational organized crimes." (2022).
