FEATURES OF LIABILITY FOR FORGERY, SALE OR USE OF DOCUMENTS IN THE CRIMINAL LEGISLATION OF SOME FOREIGN COUNTRIES

Authors

  • Sadullaev Jaxongir Djamshedovich

Keywords:

жиноят, қалбакилаштириш, электрон, ҳужжат, хорижий, кодекс, модда

Abstract

This study provides an in-depth analysis of the features of criminal liability for forgery, sale and use of forged documents in the criminal law of foreign countries. With the development of modern digital technologies, methods of document forgery are becoming increasingly sophisticated, which requires constant improvement of criminal legislation. In particular, in recent years, cases of forgery of documents related to electronic documents, digital signatures and blockchain technologies have become more frequent. As a result of the study, advanced foreign experience in combating crimes related to document forgery was comprehensively studied. In particular, the experience of Germany in dividing documents into types and establishing separate liability for each type, the approach of France based on the damage caused, flexible legal mechanisms of the UK, the experience of Russia in combating crimes related to forgery of documents by officials, the digital document protection system of Japan, the practice of China in using modern technologies, the experience of South Korea in implementing blockchain technologies were studied in detail. The legal system of each country has its own characteristics, which allows using different approaches in combating crimes related to document forgery. Based on the experience gained, scientifically substantiated proposals for improving the criminal legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan have been developed.

References

Johnson, P. (2019). The evolution of forgery crimes in the digital age. Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 27(3), 245-262.

Carpenter, T., & Freedman, J. (2016). Federal and state approaches to counterfeiting and forgery in the United States. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2890145

Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/45

Schmidt, H. (2018). The classification and prosecution of forgery crimes under German law (StGB). Review of European Criminal Law, 19(4), 129-145.

Weber, M. (2021). Recent developments in German document forgery law. European Criminal Law Review, 16(4), 289-312.

Ivanov, K. (2017). Criminal policy analysis: Document forgery in Russian law. Criminal Law Review, 33(1), 77-91.

Penal code https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/hourei/data/PC.pdf

Code pénal https://www.equalrightstrust.org/ertdocumentbank/french_penal_code_33.pdf

Miller, B. (2019). The impact of new technologies on counterfeit document crimes. Journal of Law and Technology, 14(2), 90-113.

Jones, M. (2021). Cross-border document fraud and the role of international cooperation. Cross-Border Journal for International Studies, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3501241

Black, R. (2021). Digital evidence and modern forensic challenges in document fraud cases. Journal of Cybersecurity Law, 12(4), 212-229.

Wilson, J. R. (2019). Common law approaches to document forgery. International Criminal Law Review, 24(2), 178-195.

Published

2025-04-10