POETIC ARCHITECTONICS IN ALISHER NAVOI’S “HAYRAT UL-ABROR” AND YAHYOBEY TOSHLIIJALI’S “GULSHAN UL-ANVOR”
Keywords:
хамсаписание, поэтическая архитектоника, композиция, макалат, рассказ, притча, назидание, «Хайрат ул-аброр», «Гульшан ул-анвор», сравнительный анализ, суфизм, метр сари’, структураAbstract
This article comparatively examines the poetic architectonics of epics created within the eight-century-old tradition of khamsa-writing. In particular, it reveals the distinctive features, similarities, and differences of this tradition through the examples of Alisher Navoi’s “Hayrat ul-abror” and Yahyobey Toshliijali’s “Gulshan ul-anvor.” The study focuses on the themes and ideas of the epics, their compositional structure, chapter system, the relationship between maqolats (didactic sections) and narratives, as well as poetic meter and artistic forms as the main objects of analysis.
The article also explores the theoretical foundations of the concept of architectonics and explains its relationship with composition. The structural organization of both epics is compared based on their division into introduction, main part, and conclusion. While “Hayrat ul-abror” demonstrates a consistent and systematic sequence of maqolats and narratives, “Gulshan ul-anvor” presents a relatively freer structure in which narratives, parables, and admonitions are interwoven after theoretical discussions.
The results of the study show that although both epics are written in the sari’ meter, there are significant differences in their architectonic structures. Navoi’s work is characterized by strict structural coherence, whereas Toshliijali’s epic displays greater compositional flexibility and a stronger Sufi interpretation. Additionally, the abundance of narratives and their enrichment with various forms in “Gulshan ul-anvor” define its unique artistic features.
References
Алишер Навоий. Ҳайрат ул-аброр. Мукаммал асарлар тўплами. 20-жилдлик. 7-жилд. – Тошкент.: Фан, 1991.
Архитектоника в литературе / Литературный энциклопедический словарь (Под общей редакцией В.М.Кожевникова и П.А.Николаева. – М.: Советская энциклопедия, 1987.
Ayşe Sağlam. Taşlıcalı Yahya Bey ve Hemsesi. Doktora tezi. – Diyarbakır, 2016.
Давлатов О. Алишeр Навоий шeъриятида Қуръон оятлари ва ҳадислар; Маънолар хазинаси / Истиқлол даври ўзбeк навоийшунослиги: 30 жилдлик. 28-жилд. – Тошкeнт: TAMADDUN, 2021.
Жўрақулов У. Алишер Навоий “Хамса”сида хронотоп поэтикаси. Монография. – Тошкент: Tamaddun, 2021.
Назарова Д. Абдураҳмон Жомийнинг “Субҳат ул-аброр” ва Алишер Навоийнинг “Ҳайрат ул-аброр” достонларининг қиёсий таҳлили. Филол.фан. бўйича фалс.док. (PhD) дисс... – Самарқанд, 2022.
Қуръони карим. Оли Имрон сураси, 198-оят
Қуръони карим. Инфитор сураси, 13-оят.
Қуронов Д. ва бошқалар. Архитектоника // Адабиётшунослик луғати. – Тошкент: Akademnashr, 2010.
Рустамов А. Навоийнинг бадиий маҳорати. – Тошкент: Адабиёт ва санъат, 1979.
Таşlıcalı Yahyâ Bey. Gülsen-i Envâr. Karşılaştırmalı metin. Hazırlayan Ayşe Sağlam. – Ankara, 2016.
Валихўжаев Б. Ўзбек эпик поэзияси тарихидан. – Тошкент: Фан, 1974.
Хидирназаров С. Алишер Навоийнинг “Ҳайрат ул-аброр” достони. Достонда типология ва поэтик архитектоника масаласи. Фил.фан.ном. дисс. – Тошкент, 1990
Юсупова Д. “Хамса” поэтикаси: вазн, қофия ва мазмун муштараклиги. – Тошкент: Tamaddun, 2021.
Шайх Муҳаммад Содиқ Муҳаммад Юсуф. Тафсири ҳилол. – Hilolnashr, 2023.