ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL EFFICACY OF A PHYTOSTIMULATHION BDNF IN THE THERAPY OF ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE

Authors

  • Mirdjuraev Elbek Mirshavkatovich
  • Adambaev Zufar Ibragimovich
  • Koraeva Lobar Kuvondikovna

Keywords:

Ischemic stroke, neuroprotection, BDNF, NeuroAiD II, phytodrug, treatment, rehabilitation

Abstract

The relevance of the problem of treating ischemic stroke (IS) remains due to the high mortality and disability of the population. Despite the success of reperfusion therapy, the search for effective methods of neuroprotection aimed at preserving the function of the penumbra remains a priority. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the phytodrug "NeuroAiD II" (BDNF stimulator) in the complex therapy of the acute period of ischemic stroke. An analysis of data from a cohort of 85 patients was performed. The inclusion criterion was the administration of the drug within the first 24–48 hours from the onset of the disease against the background of standard basic therapy. The efficacy was assessed by the dynamics of neurological deficit (NIHSS scale), functional outcome (Rankin scale, Barthel index) and the level of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in blood serum on the 1st and 10th days. The results of the study demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in scores on the NIHSS scale (from 11.4±2.3 to 5.1±0.8; p<0.05) and improvement in daily activity indicators by the 10th day of treatment. The level of BDNF in the "NeuroAiD II" group increased by 45% compared to baseline data. Adverse events in the form of mild allergic reactions were registered in 3.5% of cases; no cases of serious hepatotoxicity or hemorrhagic complications were identified. A conclusion was drawn about the high clinical efficacy and safety of using the phytodrug as a neuroprotector in the acute period of IS.

References

Адамбаев З.И., Иноятова С.О., Бабаджанова Н.П. Эффективность эдаравона в остром периоде ишемического инсульта в зависимости от возраста и пола // Журнал неврологии и нейрохирургических исследований, 2025.- №2.- С.70-72.

Адамбаев З.И., Киличев И.А., Сапарбаев К.И. Эффективность нейропротективных препаратов в лечении больных с ишемическим инсультом: современные стратегии // Журнал неврологии и нейрохирургических исследований, 2025;6(5):82-89.

Адамбаев З.И., Киличев И.А., Сапарбаев К.И. Лечение ишемического инсульта: фокус на нейрорегенерацию - современные стратегии и перспективы // Журнал Биомидицины и практики, Журнал Биомидицины и практики, 2025;5:233-244.

Dildora Khaydarova, Alibek Samadov. Optimization of neuroprotective therapy for ischemic stroke in the acute period. Журнал неврологии и нейрохирургических исследований. 2021.

Chen C, et al. Effects of Chinese Medicine NeuroAiD II on Recovery in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Stroke. 2022;53(3):877-884.

Khaydarova Dildora Kadirovna, Xaydarov Nodirjon Kadirovich, Khodjyeva Dilbar Tadjiyevna. Clinical basis for the development of

neuroprotective therapy in acute ischemic stroke. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2022. Р 4177-4183

Katan M, Luft AR. Global burden of stroke in young adults: continuing rise and opportunities for prevention. Curr Opin Neurol. 2018;31(2):144-151.

Kowianski P, et al. BDNF: A Key Factor in Neural Plasticity, Mechanism of Stroke Recovery and Potential Biomarker for Outcome of Stroke. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2018;52(5):434-443.

Navarro JC, et al. Efficacy and Safety of MLC601 (NeuroAiD II) in Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;30(3):106038.

Powers WJ, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2019;50(12):e344-e418.

Xing C, et al. Pathophysiology of Ischemic Stroke: An Integrated View. Neurosci Bull. 2018;34(6):1013-1022.

Published

2026-05-15