UMURTQA POG’ONASI SURUNKALI OG’RIQLARINI DAVOLASHDA RADIOTO’LQINLI ABLYASIYANING ROLI: BIZNING AMALIY TAJRIBAMIZ TAHLILI

##article.authors##

  • Shukurov Xumoyuddin Asliddin o’g’li
  • Yuldashev Ravshan Muslimovich

##article.subject##:

orqa uzunchoq bog’lamning kalsifikatlanishi; umurtqa degenerativ kasalligi; laminoplastika

##article.abstract##

So‘nggi yillarda xorijiy adabiyotlarda ko‘p darajali bo‘yin stenozini davolashda laminoplastika usuliga bo‘lgan qiziqish ortib bormoqda. Ushbu usulni joriy etish jarayonida qisqa va uzoq muddatli kuzatuv natijalarini baholash, asoratlar hamda tiklanish jarayonlarini chuqur o‘rganish muhim ahamiyat kasb etadi. Bo‘yin laminoplastikasi bo‘yin bo‘limidagi spinal kanalni dekompressiya qilish uchun qo‘llaniladi; bu holat bo‘yin spondilezi, orqa uzun bog‘lamning o‘sishi va kalsinatlanishi, oraliq disk grijasi yoki ushbu omillarning kombinatsiyasi bilan bog‘liq bo‘lishi mumkin. Ushbu usul ilk bor 1973 yili Oyama tomonidan tasvirlangan bo‘lib, shundan beri bir qancha o‘zgarishlarga uchragan. Dekompressiv-plastik jarrohlik amaliyotiga alternativ sifatida oldingi dekompressiya (korporéktomiya, diskéktomiya) va spondilodez, yoki laminektomiya orqa spondilodez bilan yoki usiz taklif etiladi. Bu usullar samarali va ishonchli hisoblanadi, biroq asoratlar xavfi yuqori. Shu bois, laminoplastika usulini yanada takomillashtirish va keng tadqiq etish talab etiladi.

Библиографические ссылки

Singh A, Tetreault L, Casey A, et al. A summary of assessment tools for patients suffering from cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review on validity, reliability and responsiveness. Eur Spine J 2015;24 Suppl 2:209-28.

Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A, et al. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40:E675-93.

Klineberg E. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review of the evidence. Orthop Clin North Am 2010;41:193-202.

Lad SP, Patil CG, Berta S, et al. National trends in spinal fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 2009; 71:66-9.

Wu JC, Ko CC, Yen YS, et al. Epidemiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and its risk of causing spinal cord injury: a national cohort study. Neurosurg Focus 2013;35:E10.

Boogaarts HD, Bartels RH. Prevalence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2015;24 Suppl 2:139-41.

Ono K, Ebara S, Fuji T, et al. Myelopathy hand. New clinical signs of cervical cord damage. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987;69: 215-9.

Lawrence BD, Brodke DS. Posterior surgery for cervical myelopathy: indications, techniques, and outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am 2012;43:29-40, vii-viii.

Bridges KJ, Simpson LN, Bullis CL, et al. Combined laminoplasty and posterior fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy treatment: a literature review. Asian Spine J 2018;12:446-58.

Fujiyoshi T, Yamazaki M, Kawabe J, et al. A new concept for making decisions regarding the surgical approach for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: the Kline. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:E990-3.

Taniyama T, Hirai T, Yamada T, et al. Modified K-line in magnetic resonance imaging predicts insufficient decompression of cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38:496-501.

Rhee JM, Basra S. Posterior surgery for cervical myelopathy: laminectomy, laminectomy with fusion, and laminoplasty. Asian Spine J 2008;2:114-26.

Liu JK, Das K. Posterior fusion of the subaxial cervical spine: indications and techniques. Neurosurg Focus 2001;10:E7.

Bakhsheshian J, Mehta VA, Liu JC. Current diagnosis and management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Global Spine J 2017;7:572-

Zhu B, Xu Y, Liu X, et al. Anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a

systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2013;22:1583-93.

Kavanagh RG, Butler JS, O’Byrne JM, et al. Operative techniques for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. Adv Orthop 2012;2012:794087.

Lin Q, Zhou X, Wang X, et al. A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2012;21:474-81.

Yalamanchili PK, Vives MJ, Chaudhary SB. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: factors in choosing the surgical approach. Adv Orthop 2012;2012:783762.

Alimi M, Njoku I, Hofstetter CP, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF): comparison between zero profile implants and anterior cervical plate and spacer. Cureus 2016;8:e573.

Zeng J, Duan Y, Yang Y, et al. Anterior corpectomy and reconstruction using dynamic cervical plate and titanium mesh cage for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e9724.

Jain A, Rustagi T, Prasad G, et al. Does segmental kyphosis affect surgical outcome after a posterior decompressive laminectomy in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Asian Spine J 2017;11:24-30.

Kim P, Murata H, Kurokawa R, et al. Myoarchitectonic spinolaminoplasty: efficacy in reconstituting the cervical musculature and preserving biomechanical function. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;7:293-304.

Laiginhas AR, Silva PA, Pereira P, et al. Long-term clinical and radiological follow-up after laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol Int 2015;6:162.

Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, et al. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983;8:693-9.

Ghasemi AA, Behfar B. Outcome of laminoplasty in cervical spinal cord injury with stable spine. Asian J Neurosurg 2016;11:282-6.

Загрузки

##submissions.published##

2025-05-23