COMPATIBILITY TREND IN THE INTEGRATION PROCESS OF THE EVOLUTION OF THE SOFT ETNOMADANIY

Authors

  • Ilxomjon Khudayarov

Keywords:

ethnocultural migration, soft migration, ethnocultural mobility, cultural identity, cultural creativity, subjective identity, cultural competence, cultural marginality, evolutionary adaptation.

Abstract

One of the main problems in the field of global changes is a significant increase in ethnocultural migration processes in the context of countries, trends in the transformation and integration of ethnocultural relations, changes in ethnic identity in international relations, strengthening interethnic harmony in various social, territorial and ethnic groups, ethnocultural ties directly depend on sociocultural dynamics as a determinant. In addition, the development of the ability to individual evolutionary adaptation in the process of ethnocultural integration, that is, the rapid adaptation of a person to a new cultural environment through his linguistic ability, strengthens the relationship between ethnocultural integration and subjective well-being, and also contributes to the development of an internal spiritual worldview of creativity. In measures of cultural integration size, the functional theoretical conceptual underpinnings of various contextual categories of soft migration and cultural integration theory are analyzed.

References

Мирзиёев Ш.М. Конституция ва қонун устуворлиги – ҳуқуқий демократик давлат ва фуқаролик жамиятининг энг муҳим мезонидир. // https: // uza.uz/oz/politics/konstitutsiya-va-onun-ustuvorligi-u-u-iy-demokratik-davlat-v-07-12-2019.

Swidler А. (2008) A. Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286. A Swidler,. (2001). Talk of Love: How Culture Matters (p. 2001). University of Chicago Press.

Vaisey S. (2019). From Contradiction to Coherence: Theory-Building in the Sociology of Culture. Duke University.

Jens Hainmueller and Daniel J. Hopkins. Public Attitudes Toward Immigration.// Copyright .2014. – P.279.

Wang Z., Zhou B., & Horsburgh S. (2021). Cultural distance and cross-border replication of China Multinational Corporations. Forum for Social Economics, 50 (4). – P.363–385.

Bisin A., Verdier T., Patacchini E., & Zenou Y. (2008). Are Muslim immigrants diferent in terms of cultural integration? Journal of the European Economic Association, 6 (2/3). – P. 445-456.

Hendriks M., & Burger M.J. (2020). Unsuccessful subjective wellbeing assimilation among immigrants: The role of faltering perceptions of the host society. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(6). – P.1985-2006.

Muallif tomonidan xorijda ishlayotgan o‘zbek migrantlari orasida 2022-2024-yillar davomida olib borilgan sotsial-onlayn tadqiqot natijalarining tahlili.

Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2010). Identity economics: How our identities shape our work, wages, and well-being. Princeton University Press, USA. – P. 331-337.

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2023). Weak, Despotic, or Inclusive? How State Type Emerges from State versus Civil Society Competition. American Political Science Review, 117(2). –P. 407-420.

Published

2026-06-10