SOME CONSIDERATIONS ON METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION

Authors

  • Farfiev Bakhramdjan

Keywords:

religion, religious belief, sectoral and special areas, sociology of religion, methodology, fundamental problems, category of Islamic rationalism

Abstract

Among the various special fields and branches of the modern system of sociological knowledge, the sociology of religion is of particular importance because of its attention to contemporary problems. Indeed, issues relating to religion and religious beliefs are among the fundamental problems of any society. In particular, in the conditions of our country, these issues are actively studied by the sociology of religion. However, it is worth noting that the sociology of religion as a special area of sociological knowledge in our country faces certain methodological problems in conducting research. In particular, in the sociology of religion, when considering the essence of the category of Islamic rationalism, some misunderstandings arise. Scientific findings to solve these problems are presented in this article.

References

Мирзиёев Ш.М. Эркин ва обод, демократик жамиятни барчамиз биргаликда барпо этамиз. //Миллий тараққиёт йўлимизни қатъият билан давом эттириб, янги босқичга кўтарамиз. 1-жилд. – Тошкент: «Ўзбекистон». 2017. (Mirziyoyev SH.M. We will build a free, democratic and prosperous state of Uzbekistan together with our courageous and noble people. //We will confidently continue the path of national development at a new stage. Volume 1. – Tashkent: “Uzbekistan”. 2018. – pp.122-123.

Абу Лайс ас-Самарқандий. Танбеҳул-Ғофилийн. Араб тилидан Д.Қўшоқов тарж. – Тошкент: «Мовароуннаҳр». 2007. (Abu Lais al-Samarkandi. Tanbehul-Gofilin, translation from Arabic by D.Kushakov. – Tashkent: “Movarounnahr”, 2007.

Али-заде А. Исламский энциклопедический словарь. – М.: «Ансар», 2007. (Ali-zade A. Islamic encyclopedic dictionary. – M.: “Ansar”, 2007.

Вебер. М. Избранные произведения. – М.: «Прогресс», 1990. (Weber. M.Selected works. – M.: “Progress”, 1990)

Вишневский В.П., Вишневская Е.Н. Рост исламский экономики в мире: институциональный анализ. //Ж. Теоретическая экономика. 2013. №5. (Vishnevsky V.P., Vishnevskaya E.N. The growth of the Islamic economy in the world: an institutional analysis. //AND. Theoretical Economics. 2013. No. 5.

Гараджа В.И. Социология религии. – М.: «ИНФРА-М», 2007. (6. Garadzha V.I. Sociology of religion. – M.: “INFRA-M”, 2007.

Муслихабади Ф.М. Основные аспекты сбалансированного подхода в исламском рационализме. //Ж. Вестник Каз НУ. Серия востоковедения. №2 (59). 2012. (Muslikhabadi F.M. Main aspects of the balanced approach in Islamic rationalism. //AND. Bulletin of KazNU. Oriental Studies Series. No. 2 (59). 2012.

Парсонс Т. Общий обзор. //Американская социология. Перспективы, проблемы, методы. –Москва: «Прогресс». 1972. (Parsons T. General overview. //American sociology. Prospects, problems, methods. – M.: “Progress”, 1972.

Рахматулин Р.Ю. Мутазилиты – основатели рационализма в арабо-мусульманской философии. // Ж. Молодой учёный. № 14 (94). Июль, 2015. (Rakhmatulin R.Yu. The Mu'tazilites are the founders of rationalism in Arab-Muslim philosophy. // J. Young scientist. No. 14 (94). July, 2015.

Шайх Муҳаммад Содиқ Муҳаммад Юсуф. Тафсири Ҳилол. Биринчи жуз.–Тошкент:«Шарқ». 2012. (Sheikh Muhammad Sadiq Muhammad Yusuf. Interpretation of Hilal. Volume first. –Tashkent: "East". 2012.

Шайх Муҳаммад Содиқ Муҳаммад Юсуф. Тафсири Ҳилол. Тўртинчи жуз.–Тошкент:«Шарқ». 2012. (Sheikh Muhammad Sadiq Muhammad Yusuf. Interpretation of Hilal. Volume four. – Tashkent: “East”. 2012

Published

2026-06-27