FOREIGN EXPERIENCE OF JUDICIAL CONTROL OVER OPERATIONAL-SEARCH ACTIVITIES
Keywords:
Operational-search, judicial control, human rights, criminal procedure, foreign experience, legislationAbstract
The article provides a comprehensive analysis of foreign experience in judicial control over operational-search activities. It comparatively examines the practices of Ukraine, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, as well as Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Particular attention is paid to ensuring privacy, protecting constitutional rights, and the role of judicial authorization in covert investigative measures. The study highlights the importance of balancing crime prevention with human rights guarantees and concludes with recommendations for improving national legislation in line with international standards.
References
https://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=31197178#pos=2909;-22
Уголовно-процессуальный кодекс ФРГ (The Code of Criminal Procedure of the Federal Republic of Germany) // URL: http://www.juristlib.ni/book
Закон Азербайджанской Республики об оперативно-розыскной деятельности (Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan on Operational-Search Activity) URL: https://mia.gov.az/ru/legislation/1/view/2/
Определение КС РФ от 14 июля 1998 г. № 86-О (Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of July 14, 1998 No. 86-O)
Определение КС РФ от 1 апреля 2008 г. № 386-О-О (Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of April 1, 2008 No. 386-O-O)
Определение КС РФ от 15 апреля 2008 г. № 312-О-О (Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of April 15, 2008 No. 312-O-O)
Определение КС РФ от 1 декабря 1999 г. № 211-О (Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of December 1, 1999 No. 211-O)
Определение КС РФ от 21 апреля 2011 г. № 580-О-О (Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of April 21, 2011 No. 580-O-O)
https://bja.ojp.gov/program/it/privacy-civil-liberties/authorities/statutes/1286
