FOREIGN PROSECUTORIAL PRACTICES IN HANDLING PETITIONS AND THEIR IMPLEMENTATION INTO NATIONAL LEGISLATION
Keywords:
right to petition, prosecutorial authorities, foreign experience, implementation, comparative analysis, principle of fairness, accountability, human rights, constitutional guarantees, rule of lawAbstract
This article examines the implementation of the constitutional right of individuals and legal entities to petition and the role of prosecutorial authorities in ensuring this right. The author analyzes the experience of foreign countries, classifying prosecution offices into various models depending on their position within the state system. Using the examples of France, Germany, the USA, South Korea, Latvia, Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Georgia, Switzerland, and others, the mechanisms of handling and supervising petitions are comparatively studied. The article argues for the necessity of incorporating principles such as fairness, humanism, accountability, and personal responsibility into the national legislation governing the consideration of petitions. It is concluded that borrowing and adapting positive foreign practices will strengthen prosecutorial oversight over the implementation of laws and guarantee the effective realization of the petition rights of citizens and organizations in the Republic of Uzbekistan.
References
Ибрагимов З.С. Мустақиллик ва Ўзбекистон Ресупбликаси прокуратураси (истиқлол йилларидаги ҳуқуқий мақоми ривожланишининг қиёсий таҳлили) / З.С.Ибрагимов. – Т.: “Noshir” 2011. – Б.66. (Ibragimov Z.S. Independence and the Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Uzbekistan (Comparative analysis of the development of its legal status during the years of independence) / Z.S. Ibragimov. – Tashkent: “Noshir”, 2011. – p. 66.)
Тошев О. “Прокуратура органларинг фаолияти: халқаро қиёсий-ҳуқуқий таҳлил”. Ҳуқуқ ва бурч. №8 (188) 2021. – Б.21 (Toshev O. Activities of Prosecutorial Bodies: International Comparative Legal Analysis. Law and Duty. No. 8 (188), 2021. – p. 21.)
Алламуратов А.Т., Эргашов А.А. Хорижий мамлакатларда прокуратура: ўқув-қўлланма / Масъул муҳаррир: ю.ф.н. О.М.Мадалиев. – Т.: ТДЮИ нашриёти, 2009. – Б.8-9 (Allamuratov A.T., Ergashev A.A. Prosecutor’s Office in Foreign Countries: A Study Guide / Responsible editor: PhD in Law O.M. Madaliev. – Tashkent: Tashkent State University of Law Publishing House, 2009. – pp. 8-9.)
Хамдамова Д. Прокуратура органларининг қиёсий таҳлили // “Ҳуқуқ ва бурч”, 2020, №4 (172). – Б.42-43 (Khamdamova D. Comparative Analysis of Prosecutorial Bodies // Law and Duty, 2020, No. 4 (172). – pp. 42–43.)
Хатамов Ш. Прокуратура органларида жисмоний ва юридик шахсларнинг мурожаатларига оид қонунлар ижроси устидан прокурор назоратини амалга ошириш масалалари. Таҳлилий-тадқиқот иши // - Тошкент: Ўзбекистон Республикаси Бош прокуратураси Академияси, 2020. – Б.14. (Khatamov Sh. Issues of Prosecutorial Supervision over the Implementation of Laws on Appeals of Individuals and Legal Entities in the Prosecutor’s Office. Analytical Research Work // – Tashkent: Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2020. – p. 14.)
Пешков М.А. Арест и обыск в уголовном процессе США. М. : Спарк, 2008. С. 23. (Peshkov M.A. Arrest and Search in the Criminal Process of the USA. Moscow: Spark, 2008. – p. 23.)
https://www.spo.go.kr/site/eng/01/10104000000002018120605.jsp
https://unafei.or.jp/publications/pdf/RS_No53/No53_13VE_Soo.pdf
https://lawyer-khroulev.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Zakon-Latvii-o-prokurature-ru.pdf
Прокуратура: вчера, сегодня, завтра (Сухаревские чтения): сб. материалов II Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. (г. Москва, 7 октября 2016 г.) / под общ. ред. О.С. Капинус; [под науч. ред. А.Ю. Винокурова; сост. Е.Ю. Алхутова, И.А. Васькина, Н.А. Кулакова]; Акад. Ген. прокуратуры Рос. Федерации. – М., 2017. – С.361 (Prosecutor’s Office: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow (Sukharev Readings): Collection of Materials of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference (Moscow, October 7, 2016) / General ed. by O.S. Kapinus; scientific ed. by A.Yu. Vinokurov; comp. by E.Yu. Alkhutova, I.A. Vaskina, N.A. Kulakova; Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation. – Moscow, 2017. – p. 361.)
http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_262/f429000abb1a74d014270ebd49006c0bde9eea0f/
https://kodeksy-by.com/zakon_rb_o_prokurature/14.htm
https://matsne.gov.ge/ru/document/download/19090/12/ru/pdf
http://prokuror.gov.kz/rus/npa/normativnye-pravovye-akty/zakon-o-prokurature
https://online.zakon.kz/document/?doc_id=35132264#pos=10;-50
https://www.consular.tj/zakon-ob-obrashenyahgrazjdan.html
http://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/act/view/ru-ru/202100
Schmidt-Aßmann. General administrative law as an idea of order: fundamentals and tasks of administrative system formation. 2., Dissolution. - Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 2006. P. 358.
Додонов В. Н. Прокуратуры стран мира. Справочник / Под общ. науч. ред. докт. юрид. наук, проф. С. П. Щербы. М.: Юрлитинформ, 2006. С. 9. (Dodonov V.N. Prosecutor’s Offices of the World: A Reference Book / General scientific ed. by Doctor of Law, Prof. S.P. Shcherba. – Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2006. – p. 9.)
http://www.rusnauka.com/22_PNR_2012/Pravo/5_115270.doc.htm
Беляков П.А. Работа с обращениями граждан прокуратур государств – участников СНГ // Правовая инициатива. 2013. № 3. (Belyakov P.A. Work with Citizens’ Appeals in the Prosecutor’s Offices of the CIS Member States // Legal Initiative. 2013. No. 3.)
