INFLICTING PENALTY FOR UNCOMPLETED CRIME

Authors

  • Kamalova Dildora Gayratovna

Keywords:

principles of sentencing, uncompleted crime, preparation for crime, criminal attempt, principle of legality, principle of individualization, principle of justice, principle of differentiation of responsibility

Abstract

In this article, the author analyzed the principles of sentencing, their meaning, correlation, and give a conclusion that the general principles of sentencing for a crime (Article 54 of the Criminal Code) and the principles of sentencing are different, in turn, independent categories that are interconnected with each other. The author analyzed the principles of sentencing: such as legality, individualization of criminal liability, differentiation of criminal liability and punishment, justice. Using the examples of judicial practice, studied the criminal law significance of these principles, their role and features in sentencing. The author also analyzed the experience of foreign countries, studied the concept of the principles of sentencing in the criminal legislation of the CIS member states. The author describes in detail the general and special types of the principle of individualization of punishment. In addition, the types of uncompleted crimes are analyzed; the principles of punishment for preparing for a crime and attempted crime are described. The circumstances that must be taken into account when sentencing for an uncompleted crime are considered in detail. As a result of the study, proposals were developed to improve the theory of criminal law and judicial practice.

References

Велиев С.А. Принципы назначения наказания. СПб.: Юридический центр Пресс. 2004. С.106. (Veliyev S.A. Principles of sentencing. St. Petersburg: Legal Center Press. 2004. P.106)

Воронин В.В. Индивидуализация наказания: понятие, критерии, значение. Дисс. канд.юрид.наук. –Москва. 2015. – С. 18. (Voronin V.V. Individualization of punishment: concept, criteria, meaning. Diss. Candidate of Legal Sciences -Moscow. 2015. - P. 18)

Энциклопедия уголовного права: Назначение наказания. Т. 9. С. 167. (Encyclopedia of Criminal Law: Sentencing. T. 9. P. 167)

Лазуткин А.И. Реализация принципа справедливости при назначении наказания в виде лишения свободы. Дисс. … канд. юрид. наук. Рязань, 2004. С. 23. (Lazutkin A.I. Implementation of the principle of justice in the imposition of punishment in the form of deprivation of liberty. Diss. … cand. legal Sciences. Ryazan, 2004, P. 23)

Зубкова В. И. Уголовное наказание и его социальная роль: теория и практика. М. 2002. С. 214-215. (Zubkova VI Criminal punishment and its social role: theory and practice. M. 2002. P. 214-215)

Ўзбекистон Республикаси Жиноят кодекси // Қонунчилик маълумотлари миллий базаси, 19.10.2022 й., 03/22/794/0939-сон (Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan // National database of legislative information, 19.10.2022, No. 03/22/794/0939)

Решетников А.Ю. Покушение на преступление в российском уголовном праве. Дис. .. канд. юрид. наук. Москва. 2008. С. 83-84 (Reshetnikov A.Yu. Attempted crime in Russian criminal law. Dis. .. cand. legal Sciences. Moscow. 2008. P. 83-84)

Жумаев А.С. Специальные правила назначения наказания за единичное преступление. Дис. .. канд. юрид. наук. Москва. 2009. С. 141 (Zhumaev A.S. Special rules for sentencing for a single crime. Dis. .. cand. legal Sciences. Moscow. 2009, p. 141)

Степашин В. М. Специальные правила назначения наказания: монография . Омск: Изд-во Ом. гос. унта, 2011. С.120 (Stepashin V. M. Special rules for sentencing: monograph. Omsk: Om publishing house. state unta, 2011. P.120)

Khamidov, N. "Conditions enabling the commission of some transnational organized crimes." (2022).

Published

2023-04-17