FEATURES OF CIVIL LIABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Keywords:
artificial intelligence, legal status of artificial intelligence, subjectivity of artificial intelligence law, electronic personality, civil liability of artificial intelligence, degree of autonomy of artificial intelligence, robotics, super artificial intelligence (super AI).Abstract
In this article, the issues of civil liability of artificial intelligence have been studied by the author. It has been analyzed the doctrines and views of the legal status of artificial intelligence. At the same time, reasonable proposals on the legal personality of artificial intelligence are put forward by the author. In addition, the prospects of artificial intelligence like Near prospects, Medium prospects, and Long-term prospects which determine the subjectivity and legal responsibility of AI have been studied. In conclusion, the reasonable proposals for the development of a specific model on determining the responsibility of artificial intelligence have been put forward.
References
Скребнева, Н. А. Юридическая ответственность в публичном и частном праве: вопросы теории и практики: дис. … канд. юрид. наук: 12.00.01 / Н. А. Скребнева. – Москва, 2017., C. 189 (Skrebneva, N. A. Legal responsibility in public and private law: questions of theory and practice: dis. ...cand. legal Sciences: 12.00.01 / N. A. Skrebneva. – Moscow, 2017., P. 189).
Апостолова Н.Н. Ответственность за вред, причиненный искусственным интеллектом//Северокавказский юридический вестник. 2021. № 1. С. 112-119.
(Apostolova N.N. Liability for harm caused by artificial intelligence // North Caucasus Legal Bulletin. 2021. No. 1. P. 112-119).
Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. – URL: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
Европейская этическая хартия об использовании искусственного интеллекта в судебных системах и окружающих их реалиях – URL: // https://rm.coe.int/ru-ethical-charter-en-version-17-12-2018-mdl-06092019-2-/16809860f4 (European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems and the realities surrounding them - URL: // https://rm.coe.int/ru-ethical-charter-en-version-17-12-2018-mdl-06092019 -2-/16809860f4)
Lawrence B. Solum. Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences// North Carolina law review. V.70 №4.1992
Jiahong Chen, Paul Burgess. The boundaries of legal personhood: how spontaneous intelligence can problematise diferences between humans, artifcial intelligence, companies and animals// Artifcial Intelligence and Law, – 2019, 73–92. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-018-9229-x
Hassler S. Do We Have to Build Robots That Need Rights? // IEEE Xplore. – URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=7864739.
Морхат П.М. Юнит искусственного интеллекта как электронное лицо// Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Юриспруденция. – 2018, № 2. С.6 – 73. (Morhat P.M. Artificial intelligence unit as an electronic person // Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Jurisprudence. – 2018, No. 2. P.6 – 73.)
Civil Law Rules on Robotics European Parliament resolution of 16.02.2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). EP reference number: P8_TA (2017)005 // – URL:https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.html.
Open letter to the European commission artificial intelligence and robotics. – URL: https://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/RoboticsOpenLetter.pdf.
Revised Issues Paper on Intellectual Property Policy and Artificial Intelligence. – URL: https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=499504.
Пономарева Е. В. Субъекты и квазисубъекты права: теоретико-правовые проблемы разграничения: автореферат дис... кандидата юридических наук: 12.00.01 / ФГБОУ ВО Уральский государственный юридический университет. – Екатеринбург, – 2019., С. 32. (Ponomareva E. V. Subjects and quasi-subjects of law: theoretical and legal problems of differentiation: abstract of the thesis... candidate of legal sciences: 12.00.01 / Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Ural State Law University. – Ekaterinburg, – 2019., p. 32.)
Jan-Erik Schirmer, Gregor Bachmann. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Personality: Introducing Teilrechtsfähigkeit: A Partial Legal Status Made in Germany. Berlin.2018. – URL: https://www.rewi.hu-berlin.de/de/lf/ls/bcm/team/jan-erik-schirmer/publikationen-und-vortraege/Schirmer_RegulatingAI_Teilrechtsfaehigkeit.pdf
Указ Президента РФ от 10.10.2019 N 490 «О развитии искусственного интеллекта в Российской Федерации» (вместе с “Национальной стратегией развития искусственного интеллекта на период до 2030 года”) // Официальный интернет-портал правовой информации. – URL: http://www.pravo.gov.ru, 11.10.2019. (Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of October 10, 2019 N 490 “On the development of artificial intelligence in the Russian Federation” (together with the “National Strategy for the Development of Artificial Intelligence for the period until 2030”) // Official Internet portal of legal information. – URL: http://www.pravo.gov.ru, 10.11.2019.)
Пройдаков, Э.М. Современное состояние искусственного интеллекта / Науковедческие исследования. М.: Институт научной информации по общественным наукам РАН, – 2018., С. 129–153. (Proydakov, E.M. Current state of artificial intelligence / Scientific research. M.: Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2018, pp. 129–153.)
Попова А.В. Этические принципы взаимодействия с искусственным интеллектом как основа правового регулирования // Правовое государство: теория и практика. – 2020., № 3 (61). С. 34–43. (Popova A.V. Ethical principles of interaction with artificial intelligence as the basis of legal regulation // Rule of law: theory and practice. – 2020., No. 3 (61). pp. 34–43.)
https://translated.turbopages.org/proxy_u/en-ru.ru.b923275d-63d6c148-2172d26f-74722d776562/https/ arstechnica.com/cars/2020/09/arizona-prosecutes-uber-safety-driver-but-not-uber-for-fatal-2018-crash/.
Горохова С.С. Искусственный интеллект: инструмент обеспечения кибербезопасности финансовой сферы или киберугроза для банков // Банковское право. – 2021. № 1. С. 35–46. (Gorokhova S.S. Artificial intelligence: a tool for ensuring cybersecurity in the financial sector or a cyber threat for banks // Banking Law. – 2021. No. 1. P. 35–46.)
Franken-algorithms: the deadly consequences of unpredictable code. – URL: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/aug/29/coding-algorithms-frankenalgos-program-danger
Занковский С.С., Михайлов Н.И. Предпринимательское право в XXI веке: истоки и перспективы – 2018: С.70–75. (Zankovsky S.S., Mikhailov N.I. Business law in the 21st century: origins and prospects – 2018: pp. 70–75.)
Морхат П.М. Искусственный интеллект: правовой взгляд. – М.: Буки Веди, – 2017. – C.257 (Morhat P.M. Artificial intelligence: legal view. – M.: Buki Vedi, – 2017. – P.257)
Amodei D. et al. Problems in AI Safety // arXiv:1606.06565v1 [cs.AI] 2016. – URL: https:// arxiv.org/pdf/1606.06565v1.pdf Azimov A. Robotaround. – N.Y: Basic Books, – 1960. P. 253
Саидов А.Х., Окюлов О.О. Некоторые аспекты усиления правовых основ защиты прав и законных интересов субъектов творческой деятельности // Труды по интеллектуальной собственности (Works on Intellectual Property). – 2022. Т. 41, № 2. С. 38–43; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/tis.2022.14454 (Saidov A.Kh., Okyulov O.O. Some aspects of strengthening the legal framework for protecting the rights and legitimate interests of subjects of creative activity // Works on Intellectual Property. – 2022. T. 41, No. 2. P. 38–43; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/tis.2022.14454)
Незнамов А. Законы робототехники. Как регулировать искусственный интеллект: – URL: http://www.forbes.ru/tehnologii/355757-zakony-robototehniki-kak-regulirovat-iskusstvennyy-intellekt (Neznamov A. Laws of robotics. How to regulate artificial intelligence: – URL: http://www.forbes.ru/tehnologii/355757-zakony-robototehniki-kak-regulirovat-iskusstvennyy-intellekt)
Закона РФ от 7.07.1993 № 5340-1 «О торгово-промышленных палатах в Российской Федерации» // Ведомости СНД и ВС РФ. 1993. № 33. Ст. 1309 (ред. Федерального закона от 30). (Law of the Russian Federation of July 7, 1993 No. 5340-1 “On Chambers of Commerce and Industry in the Russian Federation” // Gazette of the Council of People's Commissars and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 1993. No. 33. Art. 1309 (as amended by Federal Law No. 30).)
Архипов В.В., Наумов В.Б. Искусственный интеллект и автономные устройства в контексте права: о разработке первого в России Закона о робототехнике // Труды СПИИ РАН. – 2017. Вып. 6. С. 46–62. (Arkhipov V.V., Naumov V.B. Artificial intelligence and autonomous devices in the context of law: on the development of Russia’s first Law on Robotics // Proceedings of SPII RAS. – 2017. Issue. 6. pp. 46–62)
Х. Федерального закона от 26.10.2002 № 127-ФЗ «О несостоятельности (банкротстве)» // СЗ РФ. 2002. № 43. Ст. 4190 (в ред. Федерального закона от 27.12 2018 № 514-ФЗ «О внесении изменений в Федеральный закон «О рынке ценных бумаг» и отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации в части совершенствования правового регулирования осуществления эмиссии ценных бумаг» // ФЗ РФ .2018. № 53 (часть I). Ст. 8440). (X. Federal Law of October 26, 2002 No. 127-FZ “On Insolvency (Bankruptcy)” // SZ RF. 2002. No. 43. Art. 4190 (as amended by the Federal Law of December 27, 2018 No. 514-FZ “On Amendments to the Federal Law “On the Securities Market” and certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation in terms of improving the legal regulation of the issue of securities” // Federal Law of the Russian Federation .2018. No. 53 (Part I). Art. 8440).)
Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. – URL: https://bitcoin.org/ bitcoin.pdf
Хабриева Т.Я., Черногор Н.Н. Право в условиях цифровой реальности // Журнал российского права. – 2018. – № 1. – С. 85–102., С. 102.
Krausová A. Intersections between Law and Artificial Intelligence // International Journal of Computer. – 2017. – Vol. 27. – № 1. – P. 55–68. – P. 59. – URL: <http://ijcjournal.org/index.php/InternationalJournalOfComputer/article/viewFile/1071/464>.
Garforth J. Electronic Personhood: The Law and Artificial Intelligence – URL: // <https://jamesgarforthresearch.files. wordpress.com/2016/10/ internshippolicybrief.pdf>. – 2 p. – P. 2.
Редькина А.И. Концепция автономности в праве: теоретический аспект // Право и образование. – 2016. – № 11. – С. 13–21; Редькина А.И. Концепция автономности в праве: особенности, функции и проблемы применения // Право и образование. – 2016. – № 12. – С. 110–117. (Redkina A.I. The concept of autonomy in law: theoretical aspect // Law and Education. – 2016. – No. 11. – P. 13–21; Redkina A.I. The concept of autonomy in law: features, functions and problems of application // Law and Education. – 2016. – No. 12. – P. 110–117.)
Weng Y.H., Chen C.H., Sun C.T. The legal crisis of next generation robots: on safety intelligence // Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. – Stanford (California, USA), – 2007. – P. 205–209. – P. 206–207.
Robotics and artificial intelligence: A response to the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee inquiry into robotics and artificial intelligence / The RoyalAcademy of Engineering // – URL: <https://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/responses/robotics-andartificial-intelligence>. – 2016. – 6 p. – P. 6.
430 Balkin J.B. The Path of Robotics Law // California Law Review. – 2015, June. – Vol. 6. – P. 45–60. – P. 52. – URL: <https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/ cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=1071&context=clrcircuit>.
Hallevy G. Liability for crimes involving artificial intelligence systems. – Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. – 257 p. – P. 21–22.
