SOME ISSUES OF IMPROVING THE NORMS OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR PREMEDITATED MURDER UNDER EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES PROVIDED FOR BY CRIMINAL LAW
Keywords:
premeditated murder under extenuating circumstances, premeditated murder of the mother's own baby, newborn, strong mental excitement, premeditated murder in a state of passionAbstract
In this article, the author highlighted some issues of improving the norms of criminal legislation providing for liability for premeditated murder in cases of mitigation of responsibility, as well as their features. Any person, as the author notes, has the right to the necessary capture of a criminal, regardless of the possibility of evading his capture or the opportunity to seek help from other people or the authorities. In cases specifically provided for by law, a person is obliged to carry out such a catch. Failure to fulfill such an obligation entails criminal liability in cases established by law. According to the article, the institution of criminal justice for premeditated murder under extenuating circumstances is still a subject of discussion from the point of view of the theoretical justification of the features of criminal justice, causing many questions and contradictions in the field of law enforcement practice. Therefore, the problems that exist today require the development of practical recommendations for scientific and analytical generalization and the establishment of uniformity in the application of legislation. According to the author, article 99 of the Criminal Code establishes the time of the commission of the crime, but leaves open such issues as the mental state of the mother at the time of the commission of the crime, the motive and the time of taking the oath. According to this rule, if the crime was committed at the time of the absolutely normal state of mind of the mother or as a result of external influences that do not have a negative impact on the mother's psyche due to an earlier thought, then it is necessary to qualify the crime under Article 99 of the Criminal Code due to the fact that the person who committed the crime was the principle of justice and the general basis for the imposition of punishment. Therefore, it is proposed to adopt article 99 of the LC in a new edition.
References
Чихрадзе А. М. Теоретические основы формирования юридического понятия «привилегированное убийство» //Аграрное и земельное право. – 2019. – №. 12 (180). – С. 140-144. (Chikhradze A. M. Theoretical foundations of the formation of the legal concept of “privileged murder” // Agrarian and land law. – 2019. – No. 12 (180). – pp. 140-144.)
Наумов А.В. Российское уголовное право: курс лекций: Т.2.: Особенная часть (главы I-X) / А.В. Наумов. - М.: Волтерс Клувер, 2010. - 491 с. (Naumov A.V. Russian criminal law: course of lectures: T.2.: Special part (chapters I-X) / A.V. Naumov. - M.: Wolters Kluwer, 2010. - 491 p.)
Ответственность за убийство по российскому уголовному праву / А.Н. Красиков. – Саратов : Изд-во Сарат. ун-та, 1999. – 123 с (Responsibility for murder under Russian criminal law / A.N. Krasikov. – Saratov: Publishing house Sarat. University, 1999. – 123 p.)
Бородин С.В. Преступления против жизни. – М., 2000. – 620 с. (Borodin S.V. Crimes against life. – M., 2000. – 620 p.)
Пионтковский А.А. Курс советского уголовного права // А.А. Пионтковский, П.С. Ромашкин, В.М. Чхиквадзе. – М.: Наука, 1970. – 516 c. (Piontkovsky A.A. Course of Soviet criminal law // A.A. Piontkovsky, P.S. Romashkin, V.M. Chkhikvadze. – M.: Nauka, 1970. – 516 p.)
Шаргородский М.Д. Преступления против жизни и здоровья [Электронный ресурс]. - Режим доступа: http://adhdportal.com/book_1651.html, свободный. - Загл. с экрана. - Яз. Рус (Shargorodsky M.D. Crimes against life and health [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: http://adhdportal.com/book_1651.html, free. - Cap. from the screen. - Yaz. rus)
Лесниевски-Костарева, Т. А. Дифференциация уголовной ответственности. Теория и законодательная практика / Т. А. Лесниевски-Костарева. - М.: НОРМА, 2000. - 400 с (Lesnievski-Kostareva, T. A. Differentiation of criminal liability. Theory and legislative practice / T. A. Lesnievski-Kostareva. - M.: NORM, 2000. - 400 p.)
Российское уголовное право. Общая часть / Под ред. В.П. Коняхина и М.Л. Прохоровой. – М.: Контракт, 2014. – 560 с. (Russian criminal law. General part / Ed. V.P. Konyakhin and M.L. Prokhorova. – M.: Contract, 2014. – 560 p.)
Смирнова В. Е., Цыцылина Т. Л. Проблемы квалификации убийств с привилегированными составами //Вестник ВИЭПП. – 2019. – №. 1. – С. 130-135. (Smirnova V. E., Tsytsylina T. L. Problems of qualification of murders with privileged compositions // Vestnik VIEPP. – 2019. – No. 1. – pp. 130-135.)
Ельчанин П. В., Фоя В. В. Проблемы совершенствования норм об обстоятельствах, исключающих преступность деяния //Наука в современном обществе: закономерности и тенденции развития. – 2017. – С. 126-128. (Elchanin P.V., Foya V.V. Problems of improving norms on circumstances excluding criminality of an act // Science in modern society: patterns and development trends. – 2017. – pp. 126-128)
Баулин Ю.В. Право граждан на задержание преступника. – Харьков: Вища шк. Изд-во при Харьк. ун-те, 1986. – 157 c (Baulin Yu.V. The right of citizens to apprehend a criminal. – Kharkov: Vishcha school. Publishing house at Khark. Univ., 1986. – 157 p.)
Сидоров Б.В. Уголовно-правовые гарантии правомерного, социально-полезного поведения. – Казань: Изд-во Казанского ун-та, 1992. – 149 с. (Sidorov B.V. Criminal legal guarantees of lawful, socially beneficial behavior. – Kazan: Kazan University Publishing House, 1992. – 149 p.)
Якубович М.И. Необходимая оборона и задержание преступника. – М.: Знание, 1976. – 80 с; Тишкевич И.С. Право граждан на задержание преступника. – Минск: Изд-во БГУ, 1974. – 112 с; Тишкевич И.С. Борьба с преступностью – дело каждого. – М.: Юридическая литература, 1981. – 118 с (Yakubovich M.I. Necessary defense and detention of the criminal. – M.: Knowledge, 1976. – 80 p.; Tishkevich I.S. The right of citizens to apprehend a criminal. – Minsk: BSU Publishing House, 1974. – 112 p.; Tishkevich I.S. Fighting crime is everyone's business. – M.: Legal literature, 1981. – 118 p.)
Бородин С.В. Преступление против жизни. – М.: Юристъ, 1999. – 356 c (Borodin S.V. Crime against life. – M.: Yurist, 1999. – 356 p.)
