ISSUES OF QUALIFICATION OF THE ACT WITH THE NORMS OF THE CRIMINAL CODE WITH ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE
Keywords:
legal liability, criminal liability, administrative liability, administrative prejudice, degree of public danger, criminal classification, public dangerAbstract
In this article, the author covered the issues of qualification of the act with the norms of administrative pre-criminal law. The author notes that in some cases there is a need to apply an administrative precedent in the implementation of criminal liability, in particular, in the qualification of the act. Administrative preposition refers to the fact that, in order to find an act as a crime, an administrative penalty was imposed on the person who committed it for such an act before, and this condition is fixed in the article belonging to a special part of the criminal law. In this case, it should be noted that in accordance with Article 37 of the Code of administrative responsibility of the Republic of Uzbekistan, a person who has been sentenced to administrative punishment has not committed a new administrative offense within a year from the date of the expiration of this punishment, this person is considered not subject to administrative punishment. In the process of applying the rule of administrative preposition, it is noted that it is necessary to take this rule into account. Also included were the views of scientists on the civil precedence, scientific and theoretical views on whether or not it should be in criminal law, as well as the author's pose. In the article administrative preposition by the author the specificity of legal liability only for the type of criminal liability, the fact that administrative pre-criminal content, due to its nature and social danger, belongs not only to the category of crimes that are not at great social risk, but also not very serious, the specificity of administrative pre-criminal content to acts committed only intentionally, according to the sign of the subjective side, when qualifying an act with the norms of administrative pre-criminal law, attention should be paid to the fact that the necessary sign of the objective side of the content of this type of crime should be committed after the application of administrative punishment for such an act in relation to a person, the fact that in some norms of criminal law the reflection of administrative precedence does not fully meet the principles of humanism and Justice, the fact that the repeated Commission of an administrative offense within a year does not increase either the quality indicator of the crime or the level of social danger, it is justified that the consequences of liability should also be terminated after the person is brought to justice for the act committed.
References
Расулев А.А. Жиноятларни квалификация қилишда жиноят қонунининг аҳамияти. // Жиноят қонунчилигини такомиллаштириш муаммолари мавзусидаги илмий-амалий конференция материаллари тўплами. – Тошкент: ТДЮИ, 2010. – Б. 126. (Rasulev A.A. The importance of criminal law in the classification of crimes. // A collection of scientific and practical conference materials on the problems of improving criminal legislation. - Tashkent: TSUL, 2010. - P. 126.)
Кудрявцев В.Н. Общая теория квалификации преступлений. – М., 1998. – С. 8. (Kudryavtsev V.N. General theory of classification of crimes. – M., 1998. – P. 8.)
Гаухман Л.Д. Квалификация преступлений: закон, теория, практика. – М., 2005. – С. 3.; Герцензон А.А. Квалификация преступлений. – М., 2007.; Андреев И.В. Теоретико-правовые основы квалификации преступлении: Автореф. дисс... канд. юрид. наук. – Омск, 2000. – С. 21. (Gaukhman L.D. Qualification of crimes: law, theory, practice. – M., 2005. – P. 3.; Gertsenzon A.A. Qualification of crimes. – M., 2007; Andreev I.V. Theoretical and legal foundations for qualifying a crime: Author's abstract. diss... cand. legal Sci. – Omsk, 2000. – P. 21.)
Коржанский М.И. Квалификация преступлений. – Киев, 2000. – С. 10-11.; Левицкий А.Г. Квалификация преступлений. – М., 2001. – С. 140. (Korzhansky M.I. Qualification of crimes. – Kyiv, 2000. – P. 10-11.; Levitsky A.G. Qualification of crimes. – M., 2001. – P. 140.)
Ўзбекистон Республикасининг Маъмурий жавобгарлик тўғрисидаги кодекси. Қонунчилик маълумотлари миллий базаси, 03/22/810/1095-сон. (Code of Administrative Responsibility of the Republic of Uzbekistan. National database of legislative information, No. 03/22/810/1095.) https://lex.uz/docs/97664#4775713
М.Х.Рустамбаев, Қ.Р.Абдурасулова, Б.Ж.Ахраров. Ўзбекистон Республикаси Жиноят ҳуқуқи Концепцияси ва доктринасини ривожлантириш муаммолари. БВ-Ф7-007-016 рақамли давлат гранти асосида чоп этилган.–Т.: ТДЮИ нашриёти, 2011. -166 бет. –Б.92. (M.Kh.Rustambaev, Q.R.Abdurasulova, B.J.Akhrarov. Problems of developing the concept and doctrine of criminal law of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Published on the basis of the state grant number BV-F7-007-016.–T.: TSUL publishing house, 2011. -166 pages. -P.92.)
Усмоналиев М. Жиноят ҳуқуқи. Умумий қисм. Олий ўқув юртлари учун дарслик.—Т., «Янги аср авлоди», –Б.16.( Usmonaliev M. Criminal law. General part. Textbook for higher educational institutions.—T., "Generation of the New Century", -P.16.)
Ўзбекистон ССРнинг Жиноят кодекси. (1971 йил 1 январгача бўлган ўзгариш ва қўшимчалар билан). – Т., Ўзбекистон. 1971. –Б. 93. (Criminal Code of the Uzbek SSR. (as amended and supplemented up to January 1, 1971). - T., Uzbekistan. 1971. -P. 93.)
Ўзбекистон ССРнинг 1926 йилдаги Жиноят кодекси. 1946 йил 1 сентябргача бўлган ўзгаришлар билан. –Т., 1947. Ўзбекистон ССР Министрлар Совети Ишлар мудирлиги. А.Навоий номидаги Ўзбекистон Миллий кутубхонаси манбалар бўлимида сақланаётган нусхаси. ( The Criminal Code of the Uzbek SSR of 1926. With changes until September 1, 1946. - T., 1947. Directorate of Affairs of the Council of Ministers of the Uzbek SSR. A copy stored in the resource department of the National Library of Uzbekistan named after A. Navoi.)
Ўзбекистон Республикасининг Жиноят кодекси. Қонунчилик маълумотлари миллий базаси, 3/22/794/0939-сон. (Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. National Legislative Database, No. 3/22/794/0939) https://lex.uz/docs/111453
Жиноят ҳуқуқи. Умумий қисм: Дарслик. / А.С.Якубов, Р.Кабулов ва бошқ. – Тошкент. Ўзбeкистон Рeспубликаси ИИВ Акадeмияси, 2009. – Б 374. (Criminal law. General part: Textbook. / A.S. Yakubov, R. Kabulov et al. - Tashkent. Academy of Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2009. – P 374)
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Олий суди Пленумининг “Баданга қасддан шикаст етказишга оид ишлар бўйича суд амалиёти тўғрисида”ги қарори. ( Decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On judicial practice in cases related to intentional bodily injury") https://lex.uz/acts/1592419#1593065
Санталов А.И. Теоретические вопросы уголовной ответственности. – Л.: Изд-во Ленинградского университета, 1982. – С.12-13. (Santalov A.I. Theoretical issues of criminal liability. – L.: Leningrad University Publishing House, 1982. – P.12-13.)
Ўзбекистон Республикасининг Жиноят кодекси. Қонунчилик маълумотлари миллий базаси, 19.10.2022 й., 03/22/794/0939-сон. (Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. National database of legislative information, 19.10.2022, No. 03/22/794/0939) https://lex.uz/acts/111453
Махкамов О.М. Солиқ ёки бошқа мажбурий тўловларни тўлашдан бўйин товлашнинг жиноят-ҳуқуқий ва криминологик жиҳатлари: юрид.фанлар доктори илмий дар. олиш учун дисс. автореферати. –Т:, 2015. –Б.15. (Makhkamov O.M. Criminal-legal and criminological aspects of tax evasion or other compulsory payments: Doctor of Law. diss to get abstract. -T:, 2015. -P.15)
Усмоналиев М. Жиноят ҳуқуқи. Умумий қисм. Олий ўқув юртлари учун дарслик.–Т., «Янги аср авлоди», –Б.111. (Usmonaliev M. Criminal law. General part. Textbook for higher educational institutions.-T., "Generation of the New Century", -P.111)
Каримов X. (2020). Некоторые проблемы квалификации существующих преступлений института административной ответственности. Обзор законодательства Узбекистана, (3), 67–71. извлечено от (Karimov X. (2020). Some problems of qualification of existing crimes of the institution of administrative responsibility. Review of legislation of Uzbekistan, (3), 67–71. extracted from) https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/uzbek_law_review/article/view/1838
Лопашенко Н.А., Административной преюдиции в уголовном праве – нет! / Н. А. Лопашенко // Вестник Академии Генеральной прокуратуры Российской Федерации. – 2011 – № 3 (23) – С. 64–71. (Lopashenko N.A., There is no administrative prejudice in criminal law! / N. A. Lopashenko // Bulletin of the Academy of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation. – 2011 – No. 3 (23) – P. 64–71.)
Малков В.П., Административная преюдиция: за и против / В. П. Малков // Вестник Академии Генеральной прокуратуры Российской Федерации. – 2011 – № 3 (23) – С. 58–64. (Malkov V.P., Administrative prejudice: pros and cons / V.P. Malkov // Bulletin of the Academy of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation. – 2011 – No. 3 (23) – P. 58–64.)
Волженкин Б.В., Принцип справедливости и проблемы множественности преступлений по УК РФ / Б.В.Волженкин // Законность. – М., – 1998 – № 12 – С. 2–7; Ковалев М.И., Преступление и проступок / М.И.Ковалев // Проблемы совершенствования законодательства по укреплению правопорядка и усиление борьбы с правонарушениями: межвуз. сб. науч. тр. Свердловск: Изд-во Свердл. юрид. ин-та, – 1982 – С. 3–14. (Volzhenkin B.V., The principle of justice and the problem of multiplicity of crimes under the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation / B.V. Volzhenkin // Legality. – M., – 1998 – No. 12 – P. 2–7; Kovalev M.I., Crime and misdemeanor / M.I. Kovalev // Problems of improving legislation to strengthen the rule of law and strengthening the fight against offenses: interuniversity. Sat. scientific tr. Sverdlovsk: Sverdl Publishing House. legal Institute, – 1982 – P. 3–14.)
Безверхов А.Г., Административная преюдициальность в уголовном законодательстве России: истоки, реалии, перспективы / А.Г.Безверхов // Вестник Самарской гуманитарной академии. Серия: Право – 2011 – № 2. – С. 40–41. (Bezverkhov A.G., Administrative prejudice in the criminal legislation of Russia: origins, realities, prospects / A.G. Bezverkhov // Bulletin of the Samara Humanitarian Academy. Series: Law – 2011 – No. 2. – P. 40–41.)
