FUQAROLIK SUD ISH YURITUVIDA TARJIMON ISHTIROKINING O‘ZIGA XOS XUSUSIYATLARI
##article.subject##:
fuqarolik sud ish yurituvi, tarjimon, protsessual maqom, til huquqlari, sudlov kafolatlari, o‘zaro tortishuvchanlik tamoyili, oshkoralik, taraflarning tengligi, protsessual majburiyatlar##article.abstract##
Mazkur maqolada fuqarolik sud ish yurituvida tarjimon ishtirokining o‘ziga xos xususiyatlari, uning protsessual maqomi hamda sudlov jarayonida adolatni ta’minlashdagi ahamiyati ilmiy-nazariy va amaliy jihatdan tahlil qilinadi. Xususan, fuqarolik protsessida taraflarning til bilmasligi yoki sud yuritilayotgan tilni yetarli darajada tushunmasligi holatlarida tarjimon ishtirokining zarurati, uning huquq va majburiyatlari, javobgarlik masalalari hamda protsessual kafolatlari yoritib beriladi. Maqolada tarjimonning fuqarolik sud protsessidagi o‘rni O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik protsessual kodeksi normalari asosida tahlil qilinib, ularning mazmun-mohiyati ilmiy izohlanadi. Shuningdek, tarjimon ishtiroki orqali taraflarning tengligi, oshkoralik va o‘zaro tortishuvchanlik tamoyillarining ta’minlanishi masalalari ochib beriladi.
Библиографические ссылки
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik protsessual kodeksi. Qonun hujjatlari ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi, 23.01.2018-y. (Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. National database of legislative documents, 23.01.2018)
Треушников, М.К. Гражданский процесс. Москва: Городец, 2014. (Treushnikov, M.K. Civil process. Moscow: Gorodets, 2014)
Ярков, В.В. Гражданский процесс. Москва: Статут, 2016. (Yarkov, V.V. Civil process. Moscow: Statut, 2016)
Bulow, Oskar von. Gesetz und Richteramt. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1995.
Zuckerman, Adrian A.S. Zuckerman on Civil Procedure: Principles of Practice. London: Sweet-Maxwell, 2013.
Abdusamadov D. Sudlov ishlari yuritiladigan til tamoyilining konstitutsiyaviy kafolatlari. Журнал академических исследований нового Узбекистана, 2(8), 28–31. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/yoitj/article/view/58772 (Abdusamadov D. Constitutional guarantees of the principle of the language of judicial proceedings. Journal of academic studies of new Uzbekistan, 2(8), 28–31. retrieved from https://in-academy.uz/index.php/yoitj/article/view/58772)
Yo‘ldoshev S. Sud ishlarida tarjimon instituti: huquqiy asoslar va amaliy muammolar. — T.: “Adolat”, 2019. (Yuldoshev S. The Institute of Interpreters in Judicial Proceedings: Legal Basis and Practical Problems. — T.: “Adolat”, 2019)
European Court of Human Rights. Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Right to a Fair Trial (Civil Limb). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2022.
Kelsen, Hans. Reine Rechtslehre (Sof huquq nazariyasi). Wien: Franz Deuticke, (2-nashr).
Сахнова, Т.В. Гражданский процесс: теория и практика. Москва: Вольтерс Клувер, 2008. (Sakhnova, T.V. Civil procedure: theory and practice. Moscow: Walters Kluwer, 2008)
Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining Jinoyat kodeksi. Qonun hujjatlari ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi, Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Oliy Kengashining Axborotnomasi, 1995-y. (Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. National database of legislative documents, Bulletin of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 1995)
Магомадова Эльза Исаевна. Проблемы привлечения переводчика в судебном производстве в России // Гуманитарные, социально-экономические и общественные науки. 2019. №5. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-privlecheniya-perevodchika-v-sudebnom-proizvodstve-v-rossii. (Elza Isaevna Magomadova. Problemy privlecheniya perevodchika v sudebnom proizvodstve v Rossii // Humanitarnye, sotsialno-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki. 2019. No. 5. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-privlecheniya-perevodchika-v-sudebnom-proizvodstve-v-rossii)
“Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems” (Council of Europe, CEPEJ, 2018).
Пирматов Отабек. Разрешение споров в режиме онлайн это новый этап виртуализации гражданского судопроизводства // Review of law sciences. 2020. №Спецвыпуск. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/razreshenie-sporov-v-rezhime-onlayn-eto-novyy-etap-virtualizatsii-grazhdanskogo-sudoproizvodstva. (Pirmatov Otabek. Razreshenie sporov v regime online eto novyy etap virtualizatsii grajdanskogo sudoproizvodstva // Review of law sciences. 2020. #Spetsvypusk. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/razreshenie-sporov-v-rezhime-online-eto-novyy-etap-virtualizatsii-grazhdanskogo-sudoproizvodstva)
Richard Susskind. “Online Courts and the Future of Justice”, Oxford University Press, 2019.
