HAKAMLIK SUDLARINING TARKIBINI SHAKILLANTIRISH ISTIQBOLLARI
##article.subject##:
hakamlik sudi, vakolatli sud, hakamlik muhokamasi, hakamlik sudyasi, hakamlik sudi tarkibi, turlari, normativ-huquqiy hujjat, qonun, kodeks##article.abstract##
Dunyo miqyosida fuqarolik va iqtisodiy nizolarni muqobil usullar orqali hal qilishga qaratilgan sud ishlarini yuritish mexanizmlarini takomillashtirish, soddalashtirilgan ish yuritish turlarini rivojlantirish, yarashuv tartib-taomillarini qoʻllash orqali hakamlik sud ishlarining yuritilishida samaradorlikka erishish, vakolatli sudlarning ish hajmini kamaytirish, protsessual tartib va mexanizmlarni ixchamlashtirish, shuningdek ushbu sohadagi ilmiy tadqiqotlar olib borishni kuchaytirish zaruriyati mavjud. Taʼkidlab oʻtish joizki, bugungi kunda nizolarni muqobil hal etishga boʻlgan huquq va vakolatlarni toʻgʻri belgilash, nizolarni hakamlik sudlarida hal etish jarayonini takomillashtirish, hal qiluv qarorlari ijrosini tan olish hamda ijro etish masalalariga muhim ilmiy-amaliy ahamiyat kasb etadigan tadqiqot yoʻnalishlari sifatida alohida eʼtibor qaratilmoqda. Shu oʻrinda taʼkidlab oʻtish joizki, bugungi kunda vakolatli sudlardan tashqari nizolarni muqobil tartibda hal qilishda hakamlik sudlari tomonidan ham fuqarolik va iqtisodiy nizolar boʻyicha bir qancha ishlar koʻrib chiqilishida turli muammolar uchrab turibdi. Mazkur maqolada hakamlik sudlarining tarkibi, turalari va faoliyati huquqiy tahlil qilingan holda oʻrganilib chiqiladi. Shuningdek, bu borada tegishli ravishda milliy qonunchiligimizga taklif va tavsiyalar ishlab chiqiladi.
Библиографические ссылки
Иноятова С.Ф. Процессуалные механизмы обеспечения законности и обоснованности решения третейского суда: Диссертация. дне, ... канд. юрид. наук. -Ташкент. ТГЮИ, 2010. C. 52-89. (Inoyatova S.F. Procedural mechanisms to ensure the legality and validity of the arbitration court decision: Dissertation. day, ... candidate of legal sciences. - Tashkent. TSUI, 2010. P. 52-89)
Oʻzbekiston Respublikasinin “Hakamlik sudlari toʻgʻrisida”gi Qonuni (Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Arbitration Courts") // https://lex.uz/docs/1072079
Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2020-yil 17-iyundagi “Nizolarni muqobil hal etishning mexanizmlarini yanada takomillashtirish chora-tadbirlari toʻgʻrisida”gi PQ-4754-son Qarori // Qonun hujjatlari maʼlumotlari milliy bazasi, 18.06.2020-y., 07/20/4754/0771-son. (Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated June 17, 2020 No. PQ-4754 “On measures to further improve mechanisms for alternative dispute resolution” // National database of legislative documents, 18.06.2020, No. 07/20/4754/0771.)
Toshev B.N. Nizolarni hal etishning yangi muqobil shakli - xalqimizning tarixiy odati (Toshev B.N. A new alternative form of conflict resolution - a historical tradition of our people) // http://uzmarkaz.uz/uz/news/nizolarni-hal-etishning-yangi-muqobil-shakli---khalqimizning-tarikhij-odati
Adliya vazirligining rasmiy sayti. (Official website of the Ministry of Justice) https://www.minjust.uz/ru/
Bertie Vigras, The Role of Institutions in Arbitration, in Handbook of Arbitration Practice 461 (Ronald Bernstein & Derek Wood et al. eds., 2d ed. 1993).
Bruce Harris, London Maritime Arbitration, reprinted in 77 Arbitration 116, 122 (2011).
Mike Oliver Korte, Die Hamburger Freundschaftliche Arbitrage – Ein Überblick Anlässlich des 100-jährigen Jubiläums des § 20 Platzusancen für den Hamburgischen Warenhandel, in Zeitschrift Für Schiedsverfahren 240, 241 (2004); Rolf a. Schütze Et Al., Handbuch Des Schiedsverfahrens 792 (2d ed. 1990); Karl Heinz Schwab & Gerhard Walter, Kapitel 41. Grundlagen des Internationalen Schiedsverfahrens, in Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit 16 (7 th ed. 2005); Hanspeter Vogel, Institutionalisierte Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, in Recht Und Juristen in Hamburg 22 (1994).
Karl Heinz Schwab & Gerhard Walter, Kapitel 41. Grundlagen des Internationalen Schiedsverfahrens, in Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit 16 (Schwab & Walter et al. eds., 2000).
Adrian Winstanley, Review of the London Court of International Arbitration, in International Commercial Arbitration practice: 21st century perspectives 3 (Horacio Grigera Naón ed., 2010). For a sceptical view of this assessment see SCHERER ET AL., supra note 76, at 24.
Latham & Watkins “Guide to International Arbitration”. USA. 2017. pp. 20-21.
Veeder, V.V. & Diwan, R.H. (2015). National Report for England and Wales. ICCA Internation- al Handbook on Commercial Arbitration. Kluwer Law Iternational, 1984. Supplement no 87. December, p. 7; Karyl nairn “National Report for England and Wales (2019 through 2020)” Kluwer Law International. 2021. p. 5.
Степкин С.П., Губарева А.В “Государственное управление в сфере третейского разбирателства: проблемы реформы” Вопросы государственного и муниципалного управления. 2018. № 3, С. 194. (Stepkin S.P., Gubareva A.V. “Public administration in the sphere of arbitration: problems of reform” Issues of state and municipal administration. 2018. No. 3, p. 194.)
SIAC Annual Report 2017. Available at: http://www.siac.org.sg/images/stories/articles/annual_report/ SIAC Annual_Report_2017. Pdf / (accessed: 16 April, 2018); https://docplayer.com/26129301-Singapur-aziatskiy-lider-v-razreshenii-sporov.html
Tezuka, H. & Kawabata, Yu. (2018). What types of disputes are typically arbitrated? In: Japan Arbitration Guide. IBA Arbitration Committee.
http://cietac.org/index.php?m=Page&a=index&id=40&l=en
Mauro Rubino-Sammartano. International Arbitration Law and Practice - Third Edition. London. 2014. pp. 324-335.
https://www.international-arbitration-attorney.com/ru/arbitration-in-slovakia/
Asyanov Sh.M. “Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining “Hakamlik sudlari toʻgʻrisidagi” Qonuniga sharh” (Asyanov Sh.M. “Commentary on the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Arbitration Courts”)https://nrm.uz/contentf?doc=428849_hakamlik_sudlari_to%E2%80%98g%E2%80%98risidagi_qonunga_sharh&products=1_vse_zakonodatelstvo_uzbekistana
Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining 2006-yildagi “Hakamlik sudlari toʻgʻrisidagi” Qonuni. (Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Arbitration Courts" of 2006.) https://lex.uz/docs/1072079
“Toshkentda hakamlik sudi sudyasi pora bilan ushlandi” nomli maqola. 2022-y. (Article titled "Arbitration court judge caught with bribe in Tashkent." 2022.) https://kun.uz/84120542
Otaxonov F.X. “Nizolarni muqobil hal etishning tashkiliy-huquqiy mexanizmlari takomillashmoqda” Yurist axboronomasi. 3-son, 1-jil. 2020. B. 78. (Otakhonov F.Kh. “Organizational and legal mechanisms for alternative dispute resolution are being improved” Jurist Bulletin. Issue 3, Vol. 1. 2020. P. 78.)
