JINOIY RAVISHDA HOMILA TUSHIRISH (ABORT) JINOYATINING SUBYEKTIV BELGILARI
##article.subject##:
homila, abort, jinoyat, jabrlanuvchi, jinoiy javobgarlik, akusher-ginekolog, shifokor, xavf, hayot, sog‘liq, shikast, subyekt, jazo, maxsus subyekt, aqli raso, subyektiv tomon, motiv, maqsad, g‘araz##article.abstract##
Mazkur maqolada jinoiy ravishda homila tushirish (abort) jinoyati subyekti hamda jinoyat subyektiv belgilariining o‘ziga xos jihatlari bayon qilingan. Jumladan, ushbu jinoyat subyekti umumiy belgilar bilan bir qatorda maxsus subyekt belgilariga ham ega ekanligi asoslab berilgan. Shuningdek jinoiy ravishda homila tushirish (abort)da jinoyati jinoyatning maxsus subyekti ekanligi huquqshunos olimlar tomonidan bildirilgan fikrlar ilmiy, qiyosiy tahlillar asosida o‘rganilgan. Bundan tashqari, jinoiy ravishda homila tushirish (abort) jinoyatining davlatimizda hamda dunyo bo‘yicha ayrim davlatlar misolida statistikasi keltirilib tahlil qilingan, shuningdek ushbu jinoyatni davlatimizda sodir etilishi-yillar kesimida bayon qilib o‘rganilgan. Ushbu jinoyatning subyektiv tomoni ham huquqshunos olimlarning fikrlari asosida to‘liq tahlil qilib berildi hamda mazkur jinoyati bo‘yicha asosli taklif va xulosalar bayon qilingan.
Библиографические ссылки
Karimov X. Jinoyatlarni kvalifikatsiya qilishda jinoyat subyektiv mezonlarining ahamiyati // Yuridik fanlar axborotnomasi. Ilmiy-amaliy huquqiy jurnal. – Toshkent, 2018. – №2. – B.149-154. (Karimov Kh. The importance of the criteria of the subject of crime in the qualification of crimes // Bulletin of legal sciences. Scientific and practical legal journal. - Tashkent, 2018. - #2. - B.149-154.)
Макаров С.Д. Квалификатсия соучастия в преступлении с ненадлежащим субъектом // Российский судя. –Москва, 2005. – №8. – С. 22-25. (Makarov S.D. Qualification of complicity in a crime with an inappropriate subject // Russian Judge. –Moscow, 2005. – No. 8. – pp. 22-25.)
Kurbanov M. Mansabdor shaxslar jinoiy javobgarligining o‘ziga xos jihatlari // O‘zbekiston qonunchiligi tahlili. – Toshkent, 2017. – №2. – B.66-67. (Kurbanov M. Peculiar aspects of criminal liability of officials // Analysis of the legislation of Uzbekistan. - Tashkent, 2017. - #2. - B.66-67.)
Kushbakov D.M. Jinoyat subyektining jinoyat-huquqiy tavsifi va xususiyatlari: Yuridik fanlar bo‘yicha falsafa doktori (PhD) dissertatsiyasi avtoreferati. – Toshkent: IIV Akademiyasi, 2021 – B.19. (Kushbakov D.M. Criminal-legal description and characteristics of the criminal subject: Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis on legal sciences. - Tashkent: MIA Academy, 2021 - P.19.)
Кривошеин П.К. Аборт: сотсиално-правовой аспект // Вестник Волгоградской Академии МВД России. – 2012. – №1(20). – С.43. (Krivoshein P.K. Abortion: social and legal aspect // Bulletin of the Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. – 2012. – No. 1(20). – P.43.)
A.A.Allanova Jinoiy ravishda homila tushirganlik (abort) uchun javobgarlik: qiyosiy-huquqiy tahlil / Huquqiy tadqiqotlar jurnali №1 (2022) DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.26739/2181-9130-2022-1 (A.A.Allanova Liability for criminal abortion: a comparative legal analysis / Journal of legal research #1 (2022) DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.26739/2181-9130-2022-1)
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy sudining 2023-yil 17 iyuldagi №07/14-10125-258-son xati (Letter No. 07/14-10125-258 of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated July 17, 2023)
Капинус О.С., Додонов В.Н. Незаконный аборт и современное уголовное право // Закон. – 2005. – №10. – С.92. (Kapinus O.S., Dodonov V.N. Illegal abortion and modern criminal law // Law. – 2005. – No. 10. – P.92.)
Мустафаев С.Е. Уголовно наказуемое прерывание беременности: проблемные аспекты уголовного законодателства // Вестник Московского университета. – 2015. – №1. – С. 111-112. (Mustafaev S.E. Criminally punishable termination of pregnancy: problematic aspects of criminal legislation // Bulletin of Moscow University. – 2015. – No. 1. – pp. 111-112.)
Красиков А.Н. Уголовно-правовая охрана прав и свобод человека в России. – Саратов, 1996. – С. 104. (Krasikov A.N. Criminal legal protection of human rights and freedoms in Russia. – Saratov, 1996. – P. 104.)
Киселёва И.А., Безрукова Е.Н. Незаконное искусственное прерывание беременности (ст. 123 УК РФ): проблемные аспекты // Приволжский научный вестник. – 2015. – №12-2(52). – С. 67-68. (Kiseleva I.A., Bezrukova E.N. Illegal artificial termination of pregnancy (Article 123 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation): problematic aspects // Privolzhsky Scientific Bulletin. – 2015. – No. 12-2(52). – pp. 67-68.)
Jinoyat ishlari bo‘yicha Qo‘qon shahar sudi tomonidan 2012-yil 1 iyunda ko‘rilgan 1-361/2012-son jinoyat ishi (Criminal case No. 1-361/2012 heard on June 1, 2012 by the Kokan city court on criminal cases)
Рашидов Ш.М. Правовые предпосылки искусственного прерывания беременности и проблемы уголовной ответственности // “Лех Руссиcа” (Научные труды МГЮА). – 2012. – №3. – С. 530. (Rashidov Sh.M. Legal prerequisites for artificial abortion and problems of criminal liability // “Lex Russica” (Scientific works of Moscow State Law Academy). – 2012. – No. 3. – P. 530.)
Горбатова М.А. Некоторые проблемы уголовной ответственности за незаконное производство аборта // Вестник ЮУрГУ. – 2013. – №4. – С. 45-46. (Gorbatova M.A. Some problems of criminal liability for illegal abortion // Bulletin of SUSU. – 2013. – No. 4. – pp. 45-46.)
