FOREIGN EXPERIENCE IN EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF PUBLIC SERVANTS
Keywords:
public service, public servant, performance indicators, KPI system, incentives, foreign experience, the ruleAbstract
One of the priorities of any public policy is to increase the efficiency of public service, in particular, the effectiveness of public servants. In this regard, a lot of work has been done in our country, in particular, a number of tasks have been identified to develop important performance indicators necessary to evaluate the performance of employees of ministries, departments and other government agencies.
This article presents the experience of developed countries, such as Germany, the USA, Great Britain, Canada and Russia, in assessing the effectiveness of public servants and using modern methods of motivating them in accordance with their productivity. In particular, in recent years, information has been provided on the system of performance indicators (KPI), which is widely used in foreign countries not only in the private sector, but also in the public sector, on the basic principles of the system, and the stages of implementation of the efficiency system.
References
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Президентининг 2019 йил 17 январдаги ПФ-5635-сонли Фармонига 1-ИЛОВА / https://lex.uz/docs/4168749
Office of Human Resources Management / URL: https://www.commerce.gov/hr
Лесина Т.В., Чернов Д.А. Ключевые показатели эффективности на службе. Эффективность работы госслужащих // Вестник Евразийской науки, 2018 №2.
Moon M. (2000). Organizational Commitment Revised in New Public Management. Motivation, Organizational Culture, Sector and Managerial Level // Public Productivity & Management Review. Vol. 24. №. 2.
Schroter E. (2007). Reforming the Machinery of Government: The Case of the German Federal Bureaucracy // R. Koch & J. Dixon (eds.) (2007). Public Governance and Leadership, Deutscher Universitats-Verlag, Wiesbaden, P. 251-271. / URL: www. springerlink.com/index/g4g360847w34r645.pdf
Draft F. Civil Service in Germany: Characteristics of Public Employment and Modernization of Public Personnel Management. / URL: www.uni-konstanz.de/ bogumil/kuhlmann/Download/KuhlmannRoeber1.pdf
Guide to the Senior Executive Service. United States Office of Personnel Management. 2001. / URL:http://www.jobs.bpa.gov/ses/OPMSESGUIDE
https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/senior-executive-service/
Ketelaar A., Manning N., Turkisch E. (2007). Performance-based Arrangements for Senior Civil Servants OECD and other Country Experiences // OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, OECD Publishing. 2007. № 5, 34-38
Клочков А.К. KPI и мотивация персонала. Полный сборник практических инструментов. – М.: Эксмо, 2010.
Performance Management Program Guidelines (2007 – 2008). Heads of Agencies and other Governor in Council Appointees. Senior Personnel and Special Проекта Secretariat. Privy Council Office, Canada. 2008. / URL: http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/index.asp?lang=eng&page=secretariats&sub=spsppsps&doc=pmp-pgr/hoacdo/guide_e.htm
Барциц И.Н. Показатели эффективности государственного управления (субъективный взгляд на международные стандарты) (часть 1). / URL: http://www.pvlast.ru/archive/ index.433.php
New Zealand State Services Commission. / URL: http://www.ssc.govt.nz/ps-ce-rem-policy
Питер Ф. Друкер. Практика менеджмента. Пер. с анг. – М.: Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2014.
Каплан Р., Нортон Д. Сбалансированная система показателей. От стратегии к действию. – М.: Олимп-Бизнес, 2003. 210 с.
