RASMIY NASHRDAN SAMARALI FOYDALANISHGACHA: HUQUQIY AXBOROTNI TARQATISH VA ULARDAN FOYDALANISHNI TA'MINLASHNING DAVLAT MEXANIZMLARINING EVOLYUTSIYASI
Ключевые слова:
юридическая информация; официальное издание; доступ к праву; идентифицируемость правового статуса; правовая определенность; эффективное использование; консолидированные тексты; Верховенство праваАннотация
В государстве анализируются механизмы распространения правовой информации и обеспечения ее эффективного использования, а также эволюция основных процедур в данной сфере. Исследуется передовой опыт страны Европейского Союза и Новой Зеландии, особое внимание уделяется межням распространению нормативно-правовых актов с доктринальной точки зрения. Определяются этапы институционального развития распространения правой информации. Разработаны научно обоснованные предложения и рекомендации по совершенствованию существующих механизмов. Особое внимание уделяется обеспечению оперативно, достоверного и удбоного предоставления правовой информации в цифровой среде, а также вопросам ее доступности, открытости и эффективного использования обществом.
Библиографические ссылки
Appermont, N. (2025). A Conceptual Framework on Legal Complexity. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 13(2), 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2025.2515804
Bingham, T. (2009). What is the Law? Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 40(3), 597–612. https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v40i3.5259
Council of the European Union. (2013). Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union, OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, pp. 1–3. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/216/oj
Council of the European Union. (2015). Report on Access to Law (2015/C 97/03), OJ C 97, 24.3.2015, pp. 2–10. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015XG0324(01)
Council of the European Union. (2024). Council Regulation (EU) 2024/741 of 20 February 2024 amending Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/741/oj/eng
Court of Justice of the European Union. (2007). Case C-161/06, Skoma-Lux sro v Celní ředitelství Olomouc, ECLI:EU:C:2007:773, especially paras. 48–51 and 57–61. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62006CJ0161
Crawford, L. B. (2024). The Problem of Complex Legislation. Legal Theory, 30(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135232522400003X
Doherty, M. (2020). Comprehensibility as a Rule of Law Requirement: The Role of Legal Design in Delivering Access to Law. Journal of Open Access to Law, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.63567/tmz0x336
EUR-Lex. Consolidated Texts / Consolidation of Legal Acts. Official explanatory materials. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/collection/eu-law/consleg.html (accessed 7 October 2026).
Fuller, L. L. (1969). The Morality of Law (rev. ed.). Yale University Press.
Gerards, J. H. (2020). A Right of Access to Law—or Rather a Right of Legality and Legal Aid? In A. von Arnauld, K. von der Decken, & M. Susi (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric (pp. 555–562). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108676106.044
Greenleaf, G., Mowbray, A., & Chung, P. (2013). The Meaning of “Free Access to Legal Information”: A Twenty Year Evolution. Journal of Open Access to Law, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.63567/38jpyy36
Koźmiński, K., & Konca, P. (2026). The Law of Interpretation as a Recipe for Legal Knowledge in the Era of Post-Modernization of Legislation. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 14(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2025.2521177
Liebwald, D. (2015). On Transparent Law, Good Legislation and Accessibility to Legal Information: Towards an Integrated Legal Information System. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 23(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-015-9172-z
Mitee, L. E. (2017). The Right of Public Access to Legal Information: A Proposal for its Universal Recognition as a Human Right. German Law Journal, 18(6), 1429–1496. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200022392
New Zealand. Legislation Act 2019, Public Act 2019 No 58, latest displayed version as at 4 September 2026, especially ss. 70, 72, 79, 79A, and 80; Legislation Amendment Act 2026, Public Act 2026 No 7, s. 2 and ss. 15, 17, 22–24. New Zealand Legislation. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2019/58/en/latest/ ; https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2026/7/en/latest/ (accessed 7 October 2026).
Nishikawa-Pacher, A., & Hamann, H. (2023). Is Every Law for Everyone? Assessing Access to National Legislation through Official Legal Databases around the World. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 43(2), 298–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac032
Raz, J. (1979). The Rule of Law and Its Virtue. In The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (pp. 210–229). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.003.0011
Roznai, Y., & Mordechay, N. (2015). Access to Justice 2.0: Access to Legislation and Beyond. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 3(3), 333–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2015.1136151
Webb, T. E., & Geyer, R. (2020). The Drafters’ Dance: The Complexity of Drafting Legislation and the Limitations of “Plain Language” and “Good Law” Initiatives. Statute Law Review, 41(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmz008
Zariski, A. (2026). ‘It’s Complicated’: The Development of Plain Language Legislative Drafting in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. Statute Law Review, 47(1), hmag004. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmag004
