FROM OFFICIAL PUBLICATION TO EFFECTIVE USE: THE EVOLUTION OF STATE MECHANISMS FOR ENSURING THE DISSEMINATION AND USE OF LEGAL INFORMATION
Keywords:
legal information; official publication; access to law; legal-status identifiability; legal certainty; effective use; consolidated texts; rule of lawAbstract
This article analyzes mechanisms for disseminating legal information and ensuring its effective use, as well as the evolution of key procedures in this field. The advanced practices of European Union countries and New Zealand are examined, with particular attention to mechanisms for disseminating normative legal acts from a doctrinal perspective. The article also identifies stages of institutional development in the dissemination of legal information. Scientifically grounded proposals and recommendations are developed to improve existing mechanisms. The study also addresses effective ways to ensure that legal information is delivered rapidly, reliably, and conveniently in the digital environment, with particular emphasis on accessibility, openness, and public use.
References
Appermont, N. (2025). A Conceptual Framework on Legal Complexity. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 13(2), 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2025.2515804
Bingham, T. (2009). What is the Law? Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 40(3), 597–612. https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v40i3.5259
Council of the European Union. (2013). Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union, OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, pp. 1–3. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/216/oj
Council of the European Union. (2015). Report on Access to Law (2015/C 97/03), OJ C 97, 24.3.2015, pp. 2–10. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015XG0324(01)
Council of the European Union. (2024). Council Regulation (EU) 2024/741 of 20 February 2024 amending Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/741/oj/eng
Court of Justice of the European Union. (2007). Case C-161/06, Skoma-Lux sro v Celní ředitelství Olomouc, ECLI:EU:C:2007:773, especially paras. 48–51 and 57–61. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62006CJ0161
Crawford, L. B. (2024). The Problem of Complex Legislation. Legal Theory, 30(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135232522400003X
Doherty, M. (2020). Comprehensibility as a Rule of Law Requirement: The Role of Legal Design in Delivering Access to Law. Journal of Open Access to Law, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.63567/tmz0x336
EUR-Lex. Consolidated Texts / Consolidation of Legal Acts. Official explanatory materials. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/collection/eu-law/consleg.html (accessed 7 October 2026).
Fuller, L. L. (1969). The Morality of Law (rev. ed.). Yale University Press.
Gerards, J. H. (2020). A Right of Access to Law—or Rather a Right of Legality and Legal Aid? In A. von Arnauld, K. von der Decken, & M. Susi (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric (pp. 555–562). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108676106.044
Greenleaf, G., Mowbray, A., & Chung, P. (2013). The Meaning of “Free Access to Legal Information”: A Twenty Year Evolution. Journal of Open Access to Law, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.63567/38jpyy36
Koźmiński, K., & Konca, P. (2026). The Law of Interpretation as a Recipe for Legal Knowledge in the Era of Post-Modernization of Legislation. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 14(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2025.2521177
Liebwald, D. (2015). On Transparent Law, Good Legislation and Accessibility to Legal Information: Towards an Integrated Legal Information System. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 23(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-015-9172-z
Mitee, L. E. (2017). The Right of Public Access to Legal Information: A Proposal for its Universal Recognition as a Human Right. German Law Journal, 18(6), 1429–1496. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200022392
New Zealand. Legislation Act 2019, Public Act 2019 No 58, latest displayed version as at 4 September 2026, especially ss. 70, 72, 79, 79A, and 80; Legislation Amendment Act 2026, Public Act 2026 No 7, s. 2 and ss. 15, 17, 22–24. New Zealand Legislation. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2019/58/en/latest/ ; https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2026/7/en/latest/ (accessed 7 October 2026).
Nishikawa-Pacher, A., & Hamann, H. (2023). Is Every Law for Everyone? Assessing Access to National Legislation through Official Legal Databases around the World. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 43(2), 298–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac032
Raz, J. (1979). The Rule of Law and Its Virtue. In The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (pp. 210–229). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.003.0011
Roznai, Y., & Mordechay, N. (2015). Access to Justice 2.0: Access to Legislation and Beyond. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 3(3), 333–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2015.1136151
Webb, T. E., & Geyer, R. (2020). The Drafters’ Dance: The Complexity of Drafting Legislation and the Limitations of “Plain Language” and “Good Law” Initiatives. Statute Law Review, 41(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmz008
Zariski, A. (2026). ‘It’s Complicated’: The Development of Plain Language Legislative Drafting in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. Statute Law Review, 47(1), hmag004. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmag004
