THE PROCEDURAL POSITION OF STATE MANAGEMENT BODIES PROVIDING ADVISORY OPINIONS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE
Keywords:
civil process, state administration bodies protecting the rights of others, opinion on a case, specialist, guardianship and trusteeship authorities, consumer rightsAbstract
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the procedural status of state administration bodies participating in civil proceedings to provide an opinion on a case in accordance with the Civil Procedural Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. State administration bodies participate in the process solely on the basis of procedural interest, without having any material or legal interest in the outcome of the case. The author compares the procedural status of these entities with other participants in the proceedings, revealing the legal nature of their opinion, its non-binding character for the court, and the special procedure for its evaluation. Additionally, the article develops proposals for improving the current legislation.
References
Ўзбекистон Республикаси Фуқаролик процессуал кодекси. Lex.uz/docs/3517337. (Civil Procedure Code of the Republik of Uzbekistan. Lex.uz/5535095).
Каллистратова Р.Ф. Институт особого участия государственных и общественных организаций в советском гражданском процессе. Автореф. Дисс. Канд.юр.наук М., 1954, с-26. (Kallistratova R.F. The Institution of Special Participation of State and Public Organizations in the Soviet Civil Process. Extended abstract of Candidate of Legal Sciences dissertation. Moscow, 1954, p. 26.)
Джандосова Е.В. Участие в гражданском процессе государственных органов и органов местного самоуправления для дачи заключения по делу. Дисс. Канд.юр.наук М., 2006, с-21. (Dzhandosova E.V. Participation of State Bodies and Local Self-Government Bodies in Civil Proceedings to Give an Opinion on a Case. Dissertation of Candidate of Legal Sciences. Moscow, 2006, p. 21.)
Д.Хабибуллаев Фуқаролик процессуал ҳуқуқи (саволлар ва жавоблар) ўқув қўлланма / Хабибуллаев Давлатжон Юлчибоевич – Т.: ТДЮУ нашриёти, 2023, Б-50. (Khabibullaev D. Civil Procedural Law (Questions and Answers): Study guide / Khabibullaev Davlatjon Yulchiboevich – Tashkent: TSUL Publishing House, 2023, p. 50.)
Улетова Г.Д. Участие государственных органов в гражданском судопроизводстве как форма реализации защитной функции государства // Российский судья. 2018. №7. С. 154–160. (Uletova G.D. Participation of State Bodies in Civil Proceedings as a Form of Realization of the Protective Function of the State // Russian Judge. 2018. No. 7. Pp. 154–160.)
Баулин О.В. Состязательность и активность суда в гражданском процессе // Арбитражный и гражданский процесс. 2019. № 10. С. 72–78. (Baulin O.V. Adversarialness and Activity of the Court in Civil Proceedings // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2019. No. 10. Pp. 72–78.)
Нешатаева Т.Н. Публичные интересы в частноправовых спорах // Вестник гражданского процесса. 2020. №3. С. 118–130. (Neshataeva T.N. Public Interests in Private Law Disputes // Herald of Civil Procedure. 2020. No. 3. Pp. 118–130.)
Ўзбекистон Республикасининг Оила кодекси. Lex.uz/docs/104720. (Family Code of the Republik of Uzbekistan. Lex.uz/5712113).
Эсанова З.Н. Болалар тарбияси билан боғлиқ низоларни фуқаролик судида кўришнинг процессуал хусусиятлари. юрид. фан. док. дисс...автореф. – Тошкент: 2010. -42 б.
Ўзбекистон Республикасининг “Истеъмолчиларнинг ҳуқуқларини ҳимоя қилиш тўғрисида”ги қонун. Lex.uz/docs/4704 (Law of the Republik of Uzbekistan on protection of consumer rights. Lex.uz/4525010).
