SUBJECTIVE SIGNS OF VIOLATION OF CUSTOMS LEGISLATION
Keywords:
legal liability, criminal liability, administrative liability, administrative prejudice, degree of public danger, criminal classification, public dangerAbstract
The article presents some of the author's considerations on the participation of the norms of individual institutions of criminal law in the qualification of crimes of administrative prejudice. The author also notes that according to the theory of national criminal law, the requirement that the act subject to criminal prosecution be committed after the imposition of an administrative penalty is considered a necessary sign of the objective side of the composition of this crime. However, some scientists argue that in some norms of criminal law, the reflection of administrative prejudice does not fully comply with the principles of humanity and justice, the repeated commission of an administrative offense during the year does not increase both the qualitative indicator of the crime and the level of public danger, the consequences of responsibility should also be stopped after bringing a person to criminal responsibility, therefore, scientific study the issue of qualification of the composition of crimes of administrative prejudice is of urgent importance. The norms of some institutions of criminal law occupy a special place in the qualification of crimes of administrative prejudice. This is manifested in the fact that the criminal law operates in time, complicity, joint application of the norms defining responsibility for several crimes, with the qualification of acts that have administrative priority. In particular, the author paid special attention to the use of the institution of complicity, the fact that crimes of administrative prejudice provided for by the Code are not committed by any entity, the objective side of such crimes is that they should be committed only by a person who has the status of a person subject to administrative punishment, as well as the organizer and other accomplices who have not previously been brought to administrative responsibility for committing exactly the same violation, are not subject to criminal liability for crimes of administrative prejudice.
References
Расулев А.А. Жиноятларни квалификация қилишда жиноят қонунининг аҳамияти. // Жиноят қонунчилигини такомиллаштириш муаммолари мавзусидаги илмий-амалий конференция материаллари тўплами. – Тошкент: ТДЮИ, 2010. – Б. 126. (Rasulev A.A. The importance of criminal law in the classification of crimes. // A collection of scientific and practical conference materials on the problems of improving criminal legislation. - Tashkent: TDYuI, 2010. - p. 126)
Кудрявцев В.Н. Общая теория квалификации преступлений. – М., 1998. – С. 8. (Kudryavtsev V.N. General theory of classification of crimes. – M., 1998. – P. 8.)
Гаухман Л.Д. Квалификация преступлений: закон, теория, практика. – М., 2005. – С. 3.; Герцензон А.А. Квалификация преступлений. – М., 2007.; Андреев И.В. Теоретико-правовые основы квалификации преступлении: Автореф. дисс... канд. юрид. наук. – Омск, 2000. – С. 21. (Gaukhman L.D. Qualification of crimes: law, theory, practice. – M., 2005. – P. 3.; Gertsenzon A.A. Qualification of crimes. – M., 2007; Andreev I.V. Theoretical and legal foundations for qualifying a crime: Author's abstract. diss... cand. legal Sci. – Omsk, 2000. – P. 21)
Коржанский М.И. Квалификация преступлений. – Киев, 2000. – С. 10-11.; Левицкий А.Г. Квалификация преступлений. – М., 2001. – С. 140. (Korzhansky M.I. Qualification of crimes. – Kyiv, 2000. – P. 10-11.; Levitsky A.G. Qualification of crimes. – M., 2001. – P. 140)
Ўзбекистон Республикасининг Маъмурий жавобгарлик тўғрисидаги кодекси. Қонунчилик маълумотлари миллий базаси, 03/22/810/1095-сон. (Code of Administrative Responsibility of the Republic of Uzbekistan. National database of legislative information, No. 03/22/810/1095) https://lex.uz/docs/97664#4775713
Пудовочкин Ю.Е. Квалификация преступлений с административной преюдицией // Библиотека криминалиста. 2017. № 2 (31). С. 31. (Pudovochkin Yu.E. Qualification of crimes with administrative prejudice // Criminologist Library. 2017. No. 2 (31). P. 31)
Ўзбекистон Республикасининг “Ер тўғрисидаги қонун ҳужжатларини бузганлик учун жавобгарлик чоралари кучайтирилиши муносабати билан Ўзбекистон Республикасининг айрим қонун ҳужжатларига ўзгартиш ва қўшимчалар киритиш тўғрисида” Қонуни. (The Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On amendments and additions to some legal documents of the Republic of Uzbekistan in connection with the strengthening of measures of responsibility for violation of legal documents on land") https://lex.uz/docs/4224500
М.Х.Рустамбаев, Қ.Р.Абдурасулова, Б.Ж.Ахраров. Ўзбекистон Республикаси Жиноят ҳуқуқи Концепцияси ва доктринасини ривожлантириш муаммолари. БВ-Ф7-007-016 рақамли давлат гранти асосида чоп этилган.–Т.: ТДЮИ нашриёти, 2011. -166 бет. –Б.92. (M.K. Rustambaev, Q.R. Abdurasulova, B.J. Akhrarov. Problems of developing the concept and doctrine of criminal law of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Published on the basis of the state grant number BV-F7-007-016.–T.: TDYuI publishing house, 2011. -166 pages. -P.92)
Усмоналиев М. Жиноят ҳуқуқи. Умумий қисм. Олий ўқув юртлари учун дарслик.—Т., «Янги аср авлоди», –Б.16. (Usmonaliev M. Criminal law. General part. Textbook for higher educational institutions.—T., "Generation of the New Century", -P.16)
Махкамов О.М. Солиқ ёки бошқа мажбурий тўловларни тўлашдан бўйин товлашнинг жиноят-ҳуқуқий ва криминологик жиҳатлари: юрид.фанлар доктори илмий дар. олиш учун дисс. автореферати. –Т:, 2015. –Б.15. (Makhkamov O.M. Criminal-legal and criminological aspects of tax evasion or other compulsory payments: Doctor of Law. diss to get abstract. -T:, 2015. -P.15)
Усмоналиев М. Жиноят ҳуқуқи. Умумий қисм. Олий ўқув юртлари учун дарслик.–Т., «Янги аср авлоди», –Б.111 (Usmonaliev M. Criminal law. General part. Textbook for higher educational institutions.-T., "Generation of the New Century", -P.111).
Каримов X. (2020). Некоторые проблемы квалификации существующих преступлений института административной ответственности. Обзор законодательства Узбекистана, (3), 67–71. извлечено от https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/uzbek_law_review/article/view/1838
Uktamovich, Kholikov Farhod. "Types and criminal legal aspects of theft of property using bank plastic cards." European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies 2.08 (2022): 7-10.
