TABIIY HUQUQ NAZARIYALARI INTELLEKTUAL MULK HUQUQINING G‘OYAVIY ASOSI SIFATIDA: MILLIY QONUNCHILIKDA ULAR MAVJUDMI?
##article.subject##:
Tabiiy huquq nazariyalari, intellektual mulk obyektlari, tijoratlashtirish, nomoddiy ne’matlar nazariyasi, adolatli foydalanish doktrinasi, birinchi sotuv doktrinasi, axloqiy huquqlar doktrinasi##article.abstract##
Mazkur maqolada intellektual mulk obyektlariga oid ijtimoiy munosabatlarni tartibga solishda tabiiy huquq nazariyalari asosida shakllangan iqtisodiy va huquqiy doktrinalarning ahamiyati tahlil qilinadi. Ushbu nazariyalar intellektual mulkni tijoratlashtirish jarayonida va huquqiy rejimni belgilashda g‘oyaviy asos sifatida xizmat qilishi asoslantiriladi. Muallif tomonidan milliy qonunchilik va xalqaro tajribalar misolida tabiiy huquq hamda rag‘batlantirishga asoslangan yondashuvlar ko‘rib chiqilgan. O‘rganishlar yakuniga ko‘ra mualliflik pozitsiyasi bayon qilingan.
Библиографические ссылки
F. Scott Kieff, Property Rights and Property Rules for Commercializing Inventions, 85 Minn. L. Rev. 697 (2001).
Гхош Ш. Имплементация доктрины исчерпания прав: выводы, основанные на национальном опыте. (Ghosh S. Implementation of the doctrine of exhaustion of rights: conclusions based on national experience) Trade policy / 2015. № 4/4.
L. Donald Prutzman, Eric Stenshoel. The Exhaustion Doctrine in the United States. New York State Bar Association International Law and Practice Section Fall Meeting —2013 Hanoi, Vietnam. P. 2-3
М.С.Нургалеев. Понятие и принципы исчерпания исключительного права на товарный знак. Гуманитарные, социально-экономические и общественные науки, 2017. №3. (M.S. Nurgaleev. The concept and principles of exhaustion of the exclusive right to a trademark. Humanities, socio-economic and social sciences, 2017. No. 3)
Noreen Wiscovitch Rentas, Moral Rights Exclusion in the North American Free Trade Agreement and the General Agreement on Tariff and Trade: A Legal Proposal for the Inclusion of Moral Rights in Future Free Trade Agreements in Latin America and the Caribbean, 35 REV. DER. P.R. 97 (1996).
DIEGO ESPÍN CÁNOVAS, MANUAL DE DERECHO CIVIL ESPAÑOL, DERECHOS REALES, VOLUME 2, 392-398 (7th ed. 1985).
Elizabeth Schéré. Where is the Morality? Moral Rights in International Intellectual Property and Trade Law. Fordham International Law Journal. Volume 41, Issue 3 2018 Article 6.
See, for example, Justin Hughes, "The Philosophy of Intellectual Property," Georgetown Law Journal 77 (1988): 287, at 299-330. These initial impressions are examined in more detail in part III, below.
Niels van Dijk. A Conflict-Based Approach to Intellectual Rights. Monograph Book. Published: 28 Jul 2017. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786432506
Kohler, J. (1894). Die Idee des geistigen Eigentums. AcP, 32, 99−167
Kohler, J. (1880). Das Autorrecht. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer
Kohler, J. (1900). Handbuch des deutschen Patentrechts in rechtsvergleichender Darstellung. Mannheim: J. Bensheimer Verlag
О.А.Куликов. Добросовестное использование объектов авторского права. Москва – 2021. (O.A.Kulikov. Fair use of copyrighted works. Moscow – 2021)
Copyright Law of the United States and Related Laws Contained in Title 17 of the United States Code. // URL: https://www.copyright.gov/title17/title17.pdf
Луткова О.В. “Доктрина добросовестного использования произведений в современном авторском праве США” // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2016. № 2. С. 186–199. (Lutkova O.V. “Fair Use doctrine of works in modern US copyright law” // Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2016. No. 2. pp. 186–199)
Абдулманнон Абдуллоҳ. Тижорат ва ишлаб чиқариш ҳақида тасаввур – Т.: “Hilol-Nashr”, 2022. (Abdulmannon Abdullah. A vision of trade and production - T.: "Hilal-Nashr", 2022.)
