ИККИ ХАРТЛЕНД НАЗАРИЯСИ ВА МАРКАЗИЙ ОСИЁ ТАНЛОВИ
##article.subject##:
Хартленд, Марказий Осиё, демократия, геосиёсат, Ўзбекистон##article.abstract##
Ушбу мақолада замонавий геосиёсатга нисбатан янги назарий ёндашув тақдим этилган. Унда эски ва янги Хартлендлар бир вақтнинг ўзида мавжуд бўлиб ўзаро кураш олиб бориши тўғрисида фикр юритилади. Бу бир томондан империялик ва автократик дунё, иккинчи томондан эса эркин ва демократик дунё орасида кураш демакдир. Иккала дунёнинг геосиёсий келиб чиқиши ва салоҳияти мавжуд. Марказий Осиё минтақаси ривожланиши ва у юз тутган геосиёсий жараёнлар таҳлили икки Хартленд орасида мураккаб танлов муаммосини кўрсатяпти. Мазкур таҳлил шунингдек халқаро муносабатлар назариясига ҳисса қўшади.
Библиографические ссылки
Mackinder, H.J. Democratic Ideals and Reality. A Study in the Politics of Reconstruction, (National Defense University Press, 1996), pp. 175–193.
Brzezinski, Zb. The Grand Chessboard. American Primacy аnd its Geostrategic Imperatives (BasicBooks – Harper Collins Publishers, Inc, 1997), p. 125, 148.
Ali Banuazizi and Myron Weiner, eds., The New Geopolitics of Central Asia and Its Borderlands (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994), p. 11.
Gearoid O’ Tuathail. “Geopolitical Structures and Cultures: Towards Conceptual Clarity in the Critical Study of Geopolitics”, in Geopolitics: Global Problems and Regional Concerns, edited by Lasha Tchantouridze (Bison Paper 4, University of Manitoba Winnipeg, 2004), p.75.
Parag Khanna. “Connectography: Mapping the Future of Global Civilization”. (New York: Random House, 2016), p.13.
«Евросоюз дал ответ Лукашенко на обвинения во “вмешательстве в дела Беларуси» https://www.dispatchnewsdesk.com/%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%8E%D0%B7-%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BB-%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82-%D0%BB%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE-%D0%BD%D0%B0-%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BD/
Martin Wight. Power Politics (London: Penguin Books, 1978), p. 81.
Stephen Blank. “For a Transition to Democracy in Central Asia”, in Prospect for Democracy in Central Asia, edited by Birgit N. Schlyter (Transactions, Vol.15, Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul, 2005), p.4.
Tolipov, F. “Central Asia between the Euro-Atlantic and Euro-Asia: Security Services Market in the Region”, in International Research. Society. Politics. Economics, 2013, №3/4, p.58-67.
Ariel Cohen. “US Security Policy in Central Asia After the 9/11 Attack”, in Prospect for Democracy in Central Asia, edited by Birgit N. Schlyter (Transactions, Vol.15, Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul, 2005), p.133.
Толипов Ф. Стратегическая дилемма Центральной Азии // "Россия в глобальной политике". № 4, Июль - Август 2006. https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/strategicheskaya-dilemma-czentralnoj-azii/
Tolipov, F. “Will the US and Uzbekistan revisit their strategic partnership?” in 03/20/2013 issue of the CACI Analyst http://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/12683-will-the-us-and-uzbekistan-revisit-their-strategic-partnership.html
Ashok Kapur. “Geopolitics, Diplomacy, and the Military Strategy”, in Geopolitics: Global Problems and Regional Concerns, edited by Lasha Tchantouridze (Bison Paper 4, University of Manitoba Winnipeg, 2004), p. 21.
Stephen Blank. “For a Transition to Democracy in Central Asia”, in Prospect for Democracy in Central Asia, edited by Birgit N. Schlyter (Transactions, Vol.15, Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul, 2005), p.17.
